Felix Auger Aliassime vs Marcos Giron — Rome Masters Round of 16

Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 16
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN8
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1864Clay ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
Marcos Giron
USA
Marcos Giron
#87ATP
1718ELO
1604Clay ELO
$495kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLWL
Auger Aliassime F.
6-3 6-2
Giron M.
Auger Aliassime F.
662
Giron M.
320

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Marcos Giron 6-3 6-2 in the Rome Masters round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending last year's round of 16. Felix Auger Aliassime extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-01-06AdelaideQFhardFelix Auger Aliassime7-6(3) 6-3
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsR64clayFelix Auger Aliassime6-1 6-4
2023-10-16TokyoQFhardMarcos Giron6-1 6-4
2022-06-13HalleR32grassFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 5-7 6-3
2021-06-14HalleQFgrassFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Giron M.

Giron M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve advantage — Auger Aliassime F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.Giron M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
68%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.4
5.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.Giron M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
84
62
Break points saved·Even
100
98
Break points won·Slight edge
50
42
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
56
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Auger Aliassime F.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Giron M.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+260 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1604
7.5Overall Elo 1958
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1718
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
1.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.Giron M.
Freshness·Clear edge
64
87

Auger Aliassime F.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 57 games (7d) · Giron M.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 45%
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Tsitsipas S.[4]
6-07-65
Semi-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Zverev A.[2]
4-66-36-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Ruud C.[5]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Sinner J.[10]
7-656-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
7-57-61
Ruud C.[5]
Shapovalov D.[13]
7-677-5
Zverev A.[2]
Garin C.
7-56-2
R16
Djokovic N.[1]
Wawrinka S.
6-26-2
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Giron M.
6-36-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Nadal R.[3]
1-67-56-2
Ruud C.[5]
Brooksby J.
6-36-4
Sinner J.[10]
Krajinovic F.
6-27-66
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Khachanov K.
4-66-06-3
Garin C.
Cilic M.
6-34-66-4
Zverev A.[2]
De Minaur A.
6-37-65
R32
Zverev A.[2]
Baez S.
7-666-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Karatsev A.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.
Djere L.
7-683-66-4
Giron M.
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-17-64
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-67-626-2
Nadal R.[3]
Isner J.
6-36-1
Shapovalov D.[13]
Basilashvili N.
6-47-65
Brooksby J.
Goffin D.
6-07-61
Ruud C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-746-26-4
Krajinovic F.
Rublev A.[6]
6-26-4
Sinner J.[10]
Fognini F.
6-23-66-3
Khachanov K.
Carreno Busta P.[15]
6-42-66-1
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Dimitrov G.
6-35-77-64
Garin C.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-4
Cilic M.
Norrie C.[9]
5-76-26-1
De Minaur A.
Paul T.
7-56-4
R64
Goffin D.
Hurkacz H.[11]
7-687-62
Krajinovic F.
Tiafoe F.
7-677-64
Isner J.
Cerundolo F.
6-46-3
Garin C.
Passaro F.
6-36-2
Djere L.
Coric B.
6-26-736-2
Carreno Busta P.[15]
Delbonis F.
6-36-2
Karatsev A.
Harris L.
3-66-37-67
Wawrinka S.
Opelka R.[14]
3-67-56-2
Schwartzman D.[12]
Kecmanovic M.
6-23-67-63
Giron M.
Bublik A.
3-66-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ivashka I.
6-24-66-4
Basilashvili N.
Evans D.
7-626-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Sonego L.
7-653-66-3
Brooksby J.
Cobolli F.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Korda S.
6-46-1
Fognini F.
Thiem D.
6-47-65
Sinner J.[10]
Martinez P.
6-46-3
Khachanov K.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.
Nakashima B.
6-36-4
Cilic M.
Arnaldi M.
6-16-4
Norrie C.[9]
Nardi L.
6-46-4
De Minaur A.
Lajovic D.
6-46-1
Paul T.
Ramos A.
6-46-4
Baez S.
Griekspoor T.
6-36-776-2