Denis Shapovalov vs Ugo Humbert — Madrid Masters Round of 64

Madrid Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Denis Shapovalov
CAN14
Denis Shapovalov
#41ATP
1771ELO
1676Clay ELO
$749kYTD
$15MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 May 2022
clay
Ugo Humbert
FRA
Ugo Humbert
#30ATP
1868ELO
1732Clay ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Shapovalov D.
7-6 6-3
Humbert U.
Shapovalov D.
7762
Humbert U.
6130

Denis Shapovalov defeated Ugo Humbert 7-6 6-3 in the Madrid Masters round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ugo Humbert came in ranked #30, defending last year's round of 64. Denis Shapovalov extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

Head to head

3–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-16HalleR32grassDenis Shapovalov6-4 4-6 7-6(4)
2023-03-06Indian Wells MastersR64hardUgo Humbert7-5 6-4
2020-09-14Rome MastersR16clayDenis Shapovalov6-7(5) 6-1 6-4
2020-01-13AucklandQFhardUgo Humbert7-5 6-4
2019-05-20LyonR16clayDenis Shapovalov2-6 7-6(3) 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Shapovalov D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Humbert U.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Shapovalov D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shapovalov D.Humbert U.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.3
6.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shapovalov D.Humbert U.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
85
70
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Dominant
71
37
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
84
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shapovalov D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Humbert U.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0Clay Elo 1676
Surface ELO
5.0+56 Clay Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1771
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1868
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.9
Surface form
2.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Shapovalov D.Humbert U.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
90

Shapovalov D.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Humbert U.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
16°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 66%
Final
Alcaraz C.[7]
Zverev A.[2]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[7]
Djokovic N.[1]
6-757-57-65
Zverev A.[2]
Tsitsipas S.[4]
6-43-66-2
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Hurkacz H.[12]
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.[7]
Nadal R.[3]
6-21-66-3
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Rublev A.[6]
6-32-66-4
Zverev A.[2]
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
6-37-5
R16
Djokovic N.[1]
Murray A.
W/O
Zverev A.[2]
Musetti L.
6-31-0
Hurkacz H.[12]
Lajovic D.
7-56-3
Nadal R.[3]
Goffin D.
6-35-77-69
Alcaraz C.[7]
Norrie C.[9]
6-46-746-3
Rublev A.[6]
Evans D.
7-677-5
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Dimitrov G.
6-36-4
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Sinner J.[10]
6-16-2
R32
Goffin D.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-2
Zverev A.[2]
Cilic M.
4-66-46-4
Djokovic N.[1]
Monfils G.
6-36-2
Murray A.
Shapovalov D.[14]
6-13-66-2
Hurkacz H.[12]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-44-67-65
Lajovic D.
Ruud C.[5]
7-672-66-4
Nadal R.[3]
Kecmanovic M.
6-17-64
Norrie C.[9]
Isner J.
6-46-756-4
Alcaraz C.[7]
Basilashvili N.
6-37-5
Rublev A.[6]
Draper J.
2-66-47-5
Evans D.
Bautista Agut R.[17]
6-35-77-62
Dimitrov G.
Schwartzman D.[13]
6-06-3
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Pouille L.
6-36-4
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Garin C.
6-36-0
Sinner J.[10]
De Minaur A.
6-46-1
Musetti L.
Korda S.
6-46-3
R64
Hurkacz H.[12]
Dellien H.
7-56-7116-3
Murray A.
Thiem D.
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.
Cressy M.
6-27-64
Schwartzman D.[13]
Paire B.
6-26-756-1
Evans D.
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Monfils G.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-36-0
Shapovalov D.[14]
Humbert U.
7-616-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Harris L.
7-56-3
Lajovic D.
Coric B.
6-34-66-4
Kecmanovic M.
Bublik A.
6-47-5
Goffin D.
Karatsev A.
6-27-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Carreno Busta P.[16]
6-767-616-3
Norrie C.[9]
Kwon S.
7-57-5
Isner J.
Krajinovic F.
7-686-4
Basilashvili N.
Fognini F.
7-56-4
Draper J.
Sonego L.
6-46-3
Bautista Agut R.[17]
Brooksby J.
6-06-2
Pouille L.
Khachanov K.
6-36-4
Garin C.
Tiafoe F.
6-16-3
De Minaur A.
Martinez P.
7-621-66-3
Sinner J.[10]
Paul T.
6-747-646-3
Korda S.
Opelka R.[15]
6-37-5
Musetti L.
Ivashka I.
2-66-37-5
Cilic M.
Ramos A.
6-33-66-4