Dimitar Kuzmanov vs Nuno Borges — Prague CH Round of 16

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Dimitar Kuzmanov
BUL
Dimitar Kuzmanov
#394ATP
1431ELO
1394Clay ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 May 2022
clay
Nuno Borges
POR2
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1726Clay ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Kuzmanov D.
6-1 7-5
Borges N.
Kuzmanov D.
672
Borges N.
150

Dimitar Kuzmanov defeated Nuno Borges 6-1 7-5 in the Prague CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nuno Borges came in ranked #52.

Key context

  • Match story: Dimitar Kuzmanov came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kuzmanov D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kuzmanov D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Kuzmanov D.Borges N.
—
Serve
28
—
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kuzmanov D.Borges N.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kuzmanov D.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
77
Break points saved·Dominant
61
98
Break points won·Clear edge
31
54
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
25
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kuzmanov D.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Borges N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
1.7Clay Elo 1394
Surface ELO
8.3+332 Clay Elo edge
1.6Overall Elo 1431
ELO gap
8.4Overall Elo 1769
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
7.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kuzmanov D.Borges N.
Freshness·Dominant
57
96

Kuzmanov D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 71 games (7d) · Borges N.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ofner S.
Svrcina D.
6-06-4
Cachin P.[5]
Giustino L.
6-37-64
Krutykh O.[2]
Gerch L.
6-36-726-2
Semi-finals
Svrcina D.
Machac T.[6]
W/O
Ofner S.
Tseng C.[3]
7-51-66-1
Cachin P.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
2-66-26-3
Giustino L.
Kuzmanov D.
7-644-66-2
Gerch L.
Domingues J.
6-44-66-3
Krutykh O.[2]
Mensik J.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Ofner S.
Forejtek J.
6-27-65
Tseng C.[3]
Barranco Cosano J.
2-66-37-63
Machac T.[6]
Rosol L.
7-636-0
Svrcina D.
Giustino L.
6-04-1
Blancaneaux G.
Tabur C.
6-06-1
Cachin P.[5]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-3
Giustino L.
Gaio F.[8]
6-33-67-67
Kuzmanov D.
Marterer M.
6-16-0
Krutykh O.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.[8]
6-43-67-68
Gerch L.
Gigante M.
7-56-2
Domingues J.
Navone M.
7-636-3
Mensik J.
Cuevas M.
7-56-2
R16
Forejtek J.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-16-4
Rosol L.
Moraing M.[2]
4-66-36-4
Machac T.[6]
Furness E.
3-67-656-4
Svrcina D.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Novak D.[5]
7-692-66-3
Ofner S.
Rodionov J.[8]
6-17-66
Giustino L.
Nava E.
5-77-657-64
Tseng C.[3]
Miedler L.
6-26-2
Marterer M.
Krumich M.
6-36-1
Giustino L.
Donati M.
6-16-3
Blancaneaux G.
Rosol L.
1-66-27-63
Fabbiano T.
Peniston R.
6-14-66-0
Gaio F.[8]
Forejtek J.
7-652-67-5
Tabur C.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-26-4
Kuzmanov D.
Borges N.[2]
6-17-5
Cachin P.[5]
Furness E.
6-06-3
Moreno De Alboran N.[8]
Collignon R.
7-55-77-5
Cuevas M.
Gengel M.
6-06-1
Mensik J.
Rosol L.
6-26-4
Navone M.
Squire H.[5]
7-56-1
Gigante M.
Vrbensky M.
6-26-3
Krutykh O.[2]
Nouza P.
6-36-4
Domingues J.
Sachko V.[3]
7-57-5
Gerch L.
Andreev A.
6-46-4
R32
Furness E.
Muller A.
6-23-0
Tseng C.[3]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Domingues J.
6-21-66-2
Moraing M.[2]
Marterer M.
6-43-67-611
Nava E.
Pouille L.[4]
6-36-1
Novak D.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
7-646-766-4
Miedler L.
Lamasine T.
2-66-26-3
Rodionov J.[8]
Haase R.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Krumich M.
5-77-56-4
Giustino L.
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Forejtek J.
Tiurnev E.
6-36-756-4
Ofner S.
Lestienne C.
6-26-2
Krutykh O.
Popko D.[9]
6-46-1
Svrcina D.
Ionel N.
6-36-4
Rosol L.
Horansky F.
7-656-1
Machac T.[6]
Vrbensky M.
6-33-1
Rosol L.
Sachko V.
6-30-0
Marterer M.
Paulson A.
7-627-66
Borges N.[2]
Bonadio R.
6-26-4
Forejtek J.
Gerch L.
7-54-66-3
Blancaneaux G.
Ficovich J.[7]
6-46-3
Tabur C.
Purcell M.
6-46-3
Peniston R.
Vukic A.[1]
6-16-3
Donati M.
Uchida K.
2-66-46-3
Fabbiano T.
Oliel Y.
2-66-36-2
Kopriva V.[4]
Basic M.
6-36-2
Kuzmanov D.
Marchenko I.
6-16-3
Cachin P.[5]
Svrcina D.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[8]
Michalski D.
6-36-1
Giustino L.
Copil M.
3-67-627-5
Krumich M.
De Jong J.[6]
7-667-66
Furness E.
Ofner S.
7-633-2
Krutykh O.[2]
Copil M.
6-14-67-65
Collignon R.
Gautier A.
6-46-1
Cuevas M.
Krumich M.
2-66-36-3
Squire H.[5]
Neumayer L.
6-16-4
Navone M.
Fils A.
6-46-1
Domingues J.
Vocel M.
6-36-1
Sachko V.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-1
Gerch L.
Ilkel C.[7]
6-46-2
Vrbensky M.
De Schepper K.
7-57-65
Gigante M.
Burruchaga R.
7-652-66-2
Moreno De Alboran N.[8]
Moro Canas A.
6-33-67-5
Gengel M.
Roca Batalla O.[4]
6-46-746-3
Andreev A.
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-3
Nouza P.
Cornea V.
6-36-736-2
Mensik J.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-34-0
Rosol L.
Kirkin E.[6]
4-66-47-61