Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Naomi Osaka — Madrid Round of 32

Madrid · WTA · Round of 32
Sara Sorribes Tormo
ESP
Sara Sorribes Tormo
#212WTA
1664ELO
1651Clay ELO
29 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Thursday, 28 April 2022
clay
Naomi Osaka
JPN
Naomi Osaka
#13WTA
1987ELO
1886Clay ELO
$1.1MYTD
$26MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-3 6-1
Osaka N.
Sorribes Tormo S.
662
Osaka N.
310

Sara Sorribes Tormo defeated Naomi Osaka 6-3 6-1 in the Madrid round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Naomi Osaka came in ranked #13, leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending last year's round of 32. Sara Sorribes Tormo narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-07Fed Cup QLS R1: ESP vs JPNRRclaySara Sorribes Tormo6-0 6-3
2019-05-06MadridR32clayNaomi Osaka7-6(5) 3-6 6-0
2017-07-03WimbledonR128grassNaomi Osaka6-3 7-6(3)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Sorribes Tormo S.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Osaka N.

Osaka N.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sorribes Tormo S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sorribes Tormo S.Osaka N.
1st serve in·Clear edge
72%
56%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
57%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
48%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.5
6.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 118). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sorribes Tormo S.Osaka N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
91
Break points saved·Dominant
19
96
Break points won·Even
99
97
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
99
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sorribes Tormo S.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Osaka N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 38 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
2.7Clay Elo 1651
Surface ELO
7.3+235 Clay Elo edge
1.4Overall Elo 1664
ELO gap
8.6Overall Elo 1987
5.4
H2H
4.6
6.1
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
5.7
Country comfort
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sorribes Tormo S.Osaka N.
Freshness·Clear edge
97
85

Sorribes Tormo S.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Osaka N.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 75%

Draw

Final
Jabeur O.[8]
Pegula J.[12]
7-50-66-2
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[12]
Teichmann J.
6-36-4
Jabeur O.[8]
Alexandrova E.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Alexandrova E.
Anisimova A.
6-46-3
Teichmann J.
Kalinina A.
6-36-4
Pegula J.[12]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Halep S.
6-36-2
R16
Halep S.
Gauff C.[14]
6-46-4
Teichmann J.
Rybakina E.[16]
6-36-1
Kalinina A.
Raducanu E.[9]
6-22-66-4
Pegula J.[12]
Andreescu B.
7-56-1
Alexandrova E.
Bouzkova M.
6-746-07-5
Anisimova A.
Azarenka V.[15]
6-16-4
Sorribes Tormo S.
Kasatkina D.
6-41-66-3
Jabeur O.[8]
Bencic B.[11]
6-23-66-2
R32
Rybakina E.[16]
Siniakova K.
6-01-0
Raducanu E.[9]
Kostyuk M.
6-26-1
Bouzkova M.
Yastremska D.
3-67-636-1
Azarenka V.[15]
Zidansek T.
3-66-16-3
Anisimova A.
Martic P.
3-66-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Gracheva V.
7-50-66-4
Bencic B.[11]
Muchova K.
6-34-67-5
Halep S.
Badosa P.[2]
6-36-1
Kasatkina D.
Sakkari M.[4]
3-66-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Kanepi K.
6-36-3
Gauff C.[14]
Putintseva Y.
6-12-66-4
Teichmann J.
Fernandez L.[17]
6-46-4
Kalinina A.
Muguruza G.[7]
6-36-0
Sorribes Tormo S.
Osaka N.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Collins D.[6]
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-47-5
R64
Muchova K.
Zheng Q.
1-66-36-4
Zidansek T.
Haddad Maia B.
6-26-3
Kanepi K.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.[16]
Dodin O.
6-27-5
Collins D.[6]
Puig M.
7-56-0
Anisimova A.
Sabalenka A.[3]
6-23-66-4
Kalinina A.
Stephens S.
7-56-4
Fernandez L.[17]
Petkovic A.
6-11-66-4
Muguruza G.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
7-56-2
Sakkari M.[4]
Keys M.
6-786-36-4
Kasatkina D.
Bondar A.
4-66-46-3
Osaka N.
Potapova A.
6-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Giorgi C.
7-52-67-5
Andreescu B.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-43-66-0
Bouzkova M.
Pliskova K.[5]
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Cirstea S.
6-46-2
Alexandrova E.
Ostapenko J.[10]
6-24-66-4
Azarenka V.[15]
Golubic V.
7-656-3
Martic P.
Samsonova L.
7-666-1
Jabeur O.[8]
Paolini J.
7-696-1
Gracheva V.
Cornet A.
1-67-57-5
Gauff C.[14]
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-2
Halep S.
Zhang S.
6-26-3
Badosa P.[2]
Kudermetova V.
6-36-0
Teichmann J.
Kvitova P.
6-37-5
Raducanu E.[9]
Martincova T.
7-636-0
Kostyuk M.
Tauson C.
6-36-2
Yastremska D.
Minnen G.
6-30-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[13]
6-32-66-3
Bencic B.[11]
Begu I.
6-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Rogers S.
7-57-5
Siniakova K.
Konjuh A.
0-66-46-2