Jil Teichmann vs Leylah Fernandez — Madrid Round of 32

Madrid · WTA · Round of 32
Jil Teichmann
SUI
Jil Teichmann
#124WTA
1687ELO
1653Clay ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Thursday, 28 April 2022
clay
Leylah Fernandez
CAN17
Leylah Fernandez
#24WTA
1805ELO
1702Clay ELO
$787kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
23 yrs · 168 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWWL
Teichmann J.
6-4 6-4
Fernandez L.
Teichmann J.
662
Fernandez L.
440

Jil Teichmann defeated Leylah Fernandez 6-4 6-4 in the Madrid round of 32 on clay. Jil Teichmann extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Jil Teichmann edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-07Fed Cup QLS R1: SUI vs CANRRhardJil Teichmann7-6(4) 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Teichmann J.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fernandez L.

Fernandez L.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Teichmann J.Fernandez L.
—
Serve
47
—
Return
20

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Teichmann J.Fernandez L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
54%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (173 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Teichmann J.Fernandez L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
87
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
95
Break points won·Slight edge
84
95
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
90
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
90
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Teichmann J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Fernandez L.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Clay Elo 1653
Surface ELO
7.3+49 Clay Elo edge
1.8Overall Elo 1687
ELO gap
8.2Overall Elo 1805
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
4.4
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Teichmann J.Fernandez L.
Freshness·Even
100
98

Teichmann J.: 17 days rest · Fernandez L.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 75%

Draw

Final
Jabeur O.[8]
Pegula J.[12]
7-50-66-2
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[12]
Teichmann J.
6-36-4
Jabeur O.[8]
Alexandrova E.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Alexandrova E.
Anisimova A.
6-46-3
Teichmann J.
Kalinina A.
6-36-4
Pegula J.[12]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Halep S.
6-36-2
R16
Halep S.
Gauff C.[14]
6-46-4
Teichmann J.
Rybakina E.[16]
6-36-1
Kalinina A.
Raducanu E.[9]
6-22-66-4
Pegula J.[12]
Andreescu B.
7-56-1
Alexandrova E.
Bouzkova M.
6-746-07-5
Anisimova A.
Azarenka V.[15]
6-16-4
Sorribes Tormo S.
Kasatkina D.
6-41-66-3
Jabeur O.[8]
Bencic B.[11]
6-23-66-2
R32
Rybakina E.[16]
Siniakova K.
6-01-0
Raducanu E.[9]
Kostyuk M.
6-26-1
Bouzkova M.
Yastremska D.
3-67-636-1
Azarenka V.[15]
Zidansek T.
3-66-16-3
Anisimova A.
Martic P.
3-66-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Gracheva V.
7-50-66-4
Bencic B.[11]
Muchova K.
6-34-67-5
Halep S.
Badosa P.[2]
6-36-1
Kasatkina D.
Sakkari M.[4]
3-66-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Kanepi K.
6-36-3
Gauff C.[14]
Putintseva Y.
6-12-66-4
Teichmann J.
Fernandez L.[17]
6-46-4
Kalinina A.
Muguruza G.[7]
6-36-0
Sorribes Tormo S.
Osaka N.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Collins D.[6]
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-47-5
R64
Muchova K.
Zheng Q.
1-66-36-4
Zidansek T.
Haddad Maia B.
6-26-3
Kanepi K.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.[16]
Dodin O.
6-27-5
Collins D.[6]
Puig M.
7-56-0
Anisimova A.
Sabalenka A.[3]
6-23-66-4
Kalinina A.
Stephens S.
7-56-4
Fernandez L.[17]
Petkovic A.
6-11-66-4
Muguruza G.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
7-56-2
Sakkari M.[4]
Keys M.
6-786-36-4
Kasatkina D.
Bondar A.
4-66-46-3
Osaka N.
Potapova A.
6-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Giorgi C.
7-52-67-5
Andreescu B.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-43-66-0
Bouzkova M.
Pliskova K.[5]
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Cirstea S.
6-46-2
Alexandrova E.
Ostapenko J.[10]
6-24-66-4
Azarenka V.[15]
Golubic V.
7-656-3
Martic P.
Samsonova L.
7-666-1
Jabeur O.[8]
Paolini J.
7-696-1
Gracheva V.
Cornet A.
1-67-57-5
Gauff C.[14]
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-2
Halep S.
Zhang S.
6-26-3
Badosa P.[2]
Kudermetova V.
6-36-0
Teichmann J.
Kvitova P.
6-37-5
Raducanu E.[9]
Martincova T.
7-636-0
Kostyuk M.
Tauson C.
6-36-2
Yastremska D.
Minnen G.
6-30-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[13]
6-32-66-3
Bencic B.[11]
Begu I.
6-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Rogers S.
7-57-5
Siniakova K.
Konjuh A.
0-66-46-2