Ons Jabeur vs Belinda Bencic — Madrid Round of 16

Madrid · WTA · Round of 16
TUN8
Ons Jabeur
#1217WTA
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Thursday, 28 April 2022
clay
Belinda Bencic
SUI11
Belinda Bencic
#11WTA
1989ELO
1849Clay ELO
$1.8MYTD
$17MCAREER
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWLL
Jabeur O.
6-2 3-6 6-2
Bencic B.
Jabeur O.
6362
Bencic B.
2621

Ons Jabeur defeated Belinda Bencic 6-2 3-6 6-2 in the Madrid round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Belinda Bencic came in ranked #11, defending last year's quarter-final. Ons Jabeur extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Ons Jabeur closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-04-03CharlestonFclayOns Jabeur7-6(6) 6-4
2022-06-13BerlinFgrassOns Jabeur6-3 2-1 RET
2022-04-04CharlestonFclayBelinda Bencic6-1 5-7 6-4
2021-04-29MadridR16clayBelinda Bencic7-6(2) 4-3 RET
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Jabeur O.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bencic B.

Bencic B.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Jabeur O.Bencic B.
—
Serve
38
—
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jabeur O.Bencic B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (176 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jabeur O.Bencic B.
Clutch Rating·Even
90
88
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
95
Break points won·Even
96
94
Deciding sets·Even
95
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jabeur O.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bencic B.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 24 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
7.0
Surface form
8.5
Win streak
10.08-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jabeur O.Bencic B.
Freshness·
—
82

Bencic B.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 29 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 75%

Draw

Final
Jabeur O.[8]
Pegula J.[12]
7-50-66-2
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[12]
Teichmann J.
6-36-4
Jabeur O.[8]
Alexandrova E.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Alexandrova E.
Anisimova A.
6-46-3
Teichmann J.
Kalinina A.
6-36-4
Pegula J.[12]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Halep S.
6-36-2
R16
Halep S.
Gauff C.[14]
6-46-4
Teichmann J.
Rybakina E.[16]
6-36-1
Kalinina A.
Raducanu E.[9]
6-22-66-4
Pegula J.[12]
Andreescu B.
7-56-1
Alexandrova E.
Bouzkova M.
6-746-07-5
Anisimova A.
Azarenka V.[15]
6-16-4
Sorribes Tormo S.
Kasatkina D.
6-41-66-3
Jabeur O.[8]
Bencic B.[11]
6-23-66-2
R32
Rybakina E.[16]
Siniakova K.
6-01-0
Raducanu E.[9]
Kostyuk M.
6-26-1
Bouzkova M.
Yastremska D.
3-67-636-1
Azarenka V.[15]
Zidansek T.
3-66-16-3
Anisimova A.
Martic P.
3-66-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Gracheva V.
7-50-66-4
Bencic B.[11]
Muchova K.
6-34-67-5
Halep S.
Badosa P.[2]
6-36-1
Kasatkina D.
Sakkari M.[4]
3-66-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Kanepi K.
6-36-3
Gauff C.[14]
Putintseva Y.
6-12-66-4
Teichmann J.
Fernandez L.[17]
6-46-4
Kalinina A.
Muguruza G.[7]
6-36-0
Sorribes Tormo S.
Osaka N.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Collins D.[6]
6-16-1
Alexandrova E.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-47-5
R64
Muchova K.
Zheng Q.
1-66-36-4
Zidansek T.
Haddad Maia B.
6-26-3
Kanepi K.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.[16]
Dodin O.
6-27-5
Collins D.[6]
Puig M.
7-56-0
Anisimova A.
Sabalenka A.[3]
6-23-66-4
Kalinina A.
Stephens S.
7-56-4
Fernandez L.[17]
Petkovic A.
6-11-66-4
Muguruza G.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
7-56-2
Sakkari M.[4]
Keys M.
6-786-36-4
Kasatkina D.
Bondar A.
4-66-46-3
Osaka N.
Potapova A.
6-36-1
Pegula J.[12]
Giorgi C.
7-52-67-5
Andreescu B.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-43-66-0
Bouzkova M.
Pliskova K.[5]
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Cirstea S.
6-46-2
Alexandrova E.
Ostapenko J.[10]
6-24-66-4
Azarenka V.[15]
Golubic V.
7-656-3
Martic P.
Samsonova L.
7-666-1
Jabeur O.[8]
Paolini J.
7-696-1
Gracheva V.
Cornet A.
1-67-57-5
Gauff C.[14]
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-2
Halep S.
Zhang S.
6-26-3
Badosa P.[2]
Kudermetova V.
6-36-0
Teichmann J.
Kvitova P.
6-37-5
Raducanu E.[9]
Martincova T.
7-636-0
Kostyuk M.
Tauson C.
6-36-2
Yastremska D.
Minnen G.
6-30-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[13]
6-32-66-3
Bencic B.[11]
Begu I.
6-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Rogers S.
7-57-5
Siniakova K.
Konjuh A.
0-66-46-2