Sumit Nagal vs Tung Lin Wu — Savannah CH Round of 32

Savannah CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1421Clay ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Nagal S.
6-2 7-5
Wu T.
Nagal S.
672
Wu T.
250

Sumit Nagal defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-2 7-5 in the Savannah CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Wu T.
1st serve in·Even
70%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
84
Break points won·Dominant
35
6
Deciding sets·Slight edge
16
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Wu T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+116 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Clay Elo 1421
5.6Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1406
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
7.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
9.06-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
1.5
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Wu T.
Freshness·Clear edge
96
80

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Sock J.[4]
Harrison C.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Sock J.[4]
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-26-4
Harrison C.
Wolf J.[6]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Sock J.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-43-66-3
Harrison C.
Etcheverry T.[1]
6-46-2
Fratangelo B.[8]
Pereira J.
6-24-67-63
Wolf J.[6]
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
R16
Fratangelo B.[8]
Brouwer G.
7-656-3
Zhang Z.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Wolf J.[6]
Kubler J.
6-32-66-2
Rybakov A.
Jung J.
7-56-4
Harrison C.
Galarneau A.
6-26-3
Pereira J.
Crawford O.
6-46-3
Sock J.[4]
Nagal S.
6-36-3
Etcheverry T.[1]
Fils A.
1-66-33-0
R32
Rybakov A.
Uchida K.
6-36-2
Etcheverry T.[1]
Mayo A.
6-46-1
Fils A.
Kuhn N.
4-66-16-3
Pereira J.
Kozlov S.[2]
6-16-0
Harrison C.
Clark E.
6-16-3
Galarneau A.
Sandgren T.[7]
6-36-1
Sock J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-36-736-4
Fratangelo B.[8]
Safwat M.
6-06-0
Crawford O.
Tien L.
6-36-1
Brouwer G.
Rubin N.
6-26-1
Nagal S.
Wu T.
6-27-5
Zhang Z.
Kirchheimer S.
7-56-3
Nanda G.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-23-67-65
Wolf J.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-646-0
Kubler J.
Mmoh M.
6-31-1
Jung J.
Gomez E.[3]
6-24-4