Jesper De Jong vs Andrey Kuznetsov — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
RUS
Andrey Kuznetsov
35 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
De Jong J.
6-2 6-1
Kuznetsov A.
De Jong J.
662
Kuznetsov A.
210

Jesper De Jong defeated Andrey Kuznetsov 6-2 6-1 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kuznetsov A.

Kuznetsov A.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Kuznetsov A.
49
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Kuznetsov A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
50%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Kuznetsov A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
41
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
82
Break points won·Even
37
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kuznetsov A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Kuznetsov A.
Freshness·
78
—

De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Agamenone F.
Moroni G.
6-16-4
Wu Y.
Shelton B.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Moroni G.
Halys Q.[1]
7-646-3
Agamenone F.
Cobolli F.[3]
6-36-4
Wu Y.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-16-0
Shelton B.
Uchiyama Y.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Agamenone F.
Zeppieri G.
7-56-4
Moroni G.
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Halys Q.[1]
De Jong J.
4-66-47-66
Cobolli F.[3]
De Schepper K.
3-67-656-3
Wu Y.
Wolf J.[2]
6-46-1
Uchiyama Y.
Nishioka Y.[1]
3-67-626-1
Shelton B.
Kovacevic A.
7-627-5
Ficovich J.[4]
Fratangelo B.[7]
6-47-65
R16
Zeppieri G.
Draper J.[2]
6-16-4
Cobolli F.[3]
Fabbiano T.
6-46-746-2
Moroni G.
Yevseyev D.
6-06-1
De Jong J.
Arnaldi M.
6-13-66-3
De Schepper K.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-3
Kirkin E.
Riedi L.
2-66-36-4
Agamenone F.
Eysseric J.
6-42-67-5
Halys Q.[1]
Geerts M.
7-616-3
Fratangelo B.[7]
Habib H.
6-35-76-2
Kovacevic A.
Kirchheimer S.
6-34-66-4
Uchiyama Y.
Hsu Y.
7-646-2
Wolf J.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-37-61
Wu Y.
Blanch U.
6-36-4
Shelton B.
Rybakov A.
7-646-3
Nishioka Y.[1]
Galarneau A.
6-46-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Quiroz R.
W/O
R32
Zeppieri G.
Napolitano S.
6-26-2
Eysseric J.
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Agamenone F.
Guinard M.[6]
6-36-2
Fabbiano T.
Caruso S.
7-53-67-5
Grenier H.[7]
Hoang A.
6-34-66-4
Arnaldi M.
Milojevic N.[5]
2-66-46-0
Geerts M.
Pellegrino A.
4-67-656-2
De Jong J.
Kuznetsov A.
6-26-1
De Schepper K.
Celikbilek A.
6-35-76-4
Cobolli F.[3]
Coric B.
4-66-36-4
Draper J.[2]
Skatov T.
6-26-1
Riedi L.
Serdarusic N.
3-67-56-3
Kirkin E.
Stebe C.
6-47-63
Halys Q.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-6106-4
Moroni G.
Simon G.[8]
6-16-4
Yevseyev D.
Giannessi A.
7-653-2
Galarneau A.
Harris B.
6-26-1
Mochizuki S.
Riffice S.
7-627-62
Rybakov A.
Couacaud E.[8]
6-36-5
Uchiyama Y.
Tu L.
6-36-3
Wolf J.[2]
Shang J.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mmoh M.[6]
6-31-66-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Mchugh A.
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[7]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-0
Kovacevic A.
Young D.
4-66-26-1
Kirchheimer S.
Gomez E.[3]
6-47-61
Hsu Y.
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.[1]
Kypson P.
6-26-1
Quiroz R.
Smith K.
4-66-16-1
Shelton B.
Nanda G.
4-66-26-3
Habib H.
Hijikata R.
6-726-37-66
Wu Y.
Jaziri M.
6-44-0