Filip Horansky vs Emilio Nava — Ostrava CH Round of 32

Ostrava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SVK
Filip Horansky
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Horansky F.
6-2 6-4
Nava E.
Horansky F.
662
Nava E.
240

Filip Horansky defeated Emilio Nava 6-2 6-4 in the Ostrava CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Horansky F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Horansky F.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Horansky F.Nava E.
—
Serve
22
—
Return
1

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Horansky F.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (48 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Horansky F.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
52
Break points saved·Dominant
34
94
Break points won·Clear edge
33
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Horansky F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
5.3
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Horansky F.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Furness E.
Peniston R.
4-67-666-1
Semi-finals
Furness E.
Lestienne C.
7-636-2
Peniston R.
Svrcina D.
4-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Lestienne C.
Sachko V.
7-56-737-5
Furness E.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-32-67-66
Peniston R.
Rosenkranz M.
6-47-5
Svrcina D.
Forejtek J.
6-35-76-4
R16
Forejtek J.
Popko D.[8]
6-26-3
Kolar Z.[5]
Horansky F.
5-0
Furness E.
Tseng C.[3]
6-16-1
Peniston R.
Rodionov J.[7]
6-43-66-4
Svrcina D.
Miedler L.
3-66-36-4
Rosenkranz M.
Giustino L.
6-15-76-4
Sachko V.
Michalski D.
6-44-66-2
Lestienne C.
Novak D.[6]
6-22-0
R32
Novak D.[6]
Klein L.
7-647-67
Sachko V.
Balazs A.
7-646-4
Furness E.
Lacko L.
6-16-1
Rodionov J.[7]
Karol M.
6-26-2
Rosenkranz M.
Vukic A.[4]
4-66-46-2
Popko D.[8]
Ofner S.
7-653-66-4
Svrcina D.
Moutet C.[1]
6-14-67-63
Miedler L.
Mensik J.
6-16-1
Giustino L.
Barrere G.
6-45-76-4
Tseng C.[3]
Nejedly P.
6-26-4
Lestienne C.
Zuk K.
6-06-1
Peniston R.
Gojo B.
7-656-3
Forejtek J.
Kovalik J.
7-56-4
Horansky F.
Nava E.
6-26-4
Michalski D.
Moraing M.[2]
6-37-5
Kolar Z.[5]
Rosol L.
6-37-5