Ernests Gulbis vs Luigi Sorrentino — Rome CH Qualifying Round 1

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
LAT7
Ernests Gulbis
37 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
ITA
Luigi Sorrentino
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLL
Gulbis E.
7-6 6-3
Sorrentino L.
Gulbis E.
7762
Sorrentino L.
6430

Ernests Gulbis defeated Luigi Sorrentino 7-6 6-3 in the Rome CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gulbis E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sorrentino L.

Sorrentino L.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gulbis E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gulbis E.Sorrentino L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.5
2.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (52 vs 8). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gulbis E.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sorrentino L.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Kirkin E.[5]
Gulbis E.[7]
6-36-3
Yevseyev D.[6]
Orlov V.
6-26-4
Eysseric J.
Riedi L.[4]
4-66-36-2
Van Assche L.[11]
Benchetrit E.
2-67-56-2
Geerts M.[2]
Virtanen O.[10]
6-14-66-4
De Schepper K.
Added D.[9]
6-46-0
Kirchheimer S.[11]
Baadi T.
7-57-65
Shelton B.[5]
Draxl L.[9]
6-46-1
Young D.
Pannu K.
7-626-4
Pervolarakis M.[2]
Mukund S.[7]
6-34-66-3
Kypson P.
Maloney P.
6-37-69
Shang J.[1]
Cassone M.
6-43-66-2
Q1
Riedi L.[4]
Del Federico A.
6-36-3
Geerts M.[2]
Capecchi D.
6-12-67-5
Gulbis E.[7]
Sorrentino L.
7-646-3
Kirkin E.[5]
Echeverria J.
6-26-1
Van Assche L.[11]
Di Nicola G.
6-16-0
Orlov V.
Squire H.[8]
6-16-3
Eysseric J.
Sanchez Jover C.[12]
6-06-3
Benchetrit E.
Gautier A.[3]
6-46-3
Virtanen O.[10]
Vilardo F.
6-16-1
De Schepper K.
Vatutin A.[1]
6-46-4
Maloney P.
Shimabukuro S.[4]
7-53-66-3
Baadi T.
Cernoch B.
4-66-36-0
Shang J.[1]
Harrison R.
7-57-5
Shelton B.[5]
Matsui T.
6-06-2
Pervolarakis M.[2]
Sigouin B.
6-36-0
Kypson P.
Chappell N.[8]
6-36-2
Draxl L.[9]
Reinberg E.
6-26-1
Kirchheimer S.[11]
Balaji N.
6-46-1
Young D.
Mcnally J.[12]
0-66-32-0
Pannu K.
Sweeny D.[3]
6-33-66-3
Mukund S.[7]
Uesugi K.
4-67-656-1
Cassone M.
Clark E.[10]
7-646-1