Emilio Nava vs Marek Gengel — Ostrava CH Qualifying Round 2

Ostrava CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Emilio Nava
USA6
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
Marek Gengel
CZE9
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1260Clay ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Nava E.
6-3 3-6 7-5
Gengel M.
Nava E.
6372
Gengel M.
3651

Emilio Nava defeated Marek Gengel 6-3 3-6 7-5 in the Ostrava CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Nava closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Nava E.Gengel M.
22
Serve
—
1
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.7
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
11
Break points saved·Dominant
94
35
Break points won·Slight edge
17
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
54
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Gengel M.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+426 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1260
8.6Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1411
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.5
Surface form
1.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
9.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Gengel M.
Freshness·
100
—

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Furness E.[3]
Verbeek S.
6-16-2
Nejedly P.
Miedler L.[5]
6-36-3
Nava E.[6]
Gengel M.[9]
6-33-67-5
Rosenkranz M.[7]
Klein L.[4]
7-653-67-64
Michalski D.[2]
Bobrov B.[12]
6-36-3
Rosol L.[1]
Erler A.[8]
6-26-0
Q1
Nava E.[6]
Cretu C.
6-26-2
Michalski D.[2]
Lomakin G.
6-36-1
Bobrov B.[12]
Paulson A.
4-66-47-5
Gengel M.[9]
Safranek V.
5-76-26-3
Nejedly P.
Poljak D.[10]
1-66-36-4
Miedler L.[5]
Jermar J.
6-16-3
Rosenkranz M.[7]
Malis S.
6-16-1
Verbeek S.
Kravchenko G.[11]
6-26-4
Furness E.[3]
Krumich M.
6-36-3
Erler A.[8]
Horak O.
6-756-26-3
Rosol L.[1]
Fayziev S.
1-66-16-4