Maxime Cressy vs Daniel Evans — Munich Round of 32

Munich · ATP · Round of 32
USA
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
Daniel Evans
GBR6
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1499Clay ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
Cressy M.
6-4 6-4
Evans D.
Cressy M.
662
Evans D.
440

Maxime Cressy defeated Daniel Evans 6-4 6-4 in the Munich round of 32 on clay. Maxime Cressy extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Maxime Cressy edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-06-20EastbourneR16grassMaxime Cressy7-6(2) 6-4
2022-01-10SydneyQFhardDaniel Evans6-4 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Evans D.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Evans D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.4
4.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
9.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (179 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Evans D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
73
Break points saved·Even
96
97
Break points won·Dominant
2
61
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Evans D.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
2.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cressy M.Evans D.
Freshness·
—
100

Evans D.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
12°CDrizzle
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 64%
Final
Rune H.
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
3-4
Semi-finals
Rune H.
Otte O.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
Kecmanovic M.[7]
2-67-646-4
Quarter-finals
Rune H.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-06-2
Otte O.
Tabilo A.
6-17-61
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Basilashvili N.[4]
7-656-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
Ruud C.[2]
7-56-1
R16
Tabilo A.
Gaston H.
6-22-64-1
Rune H.
Zverev A.[1]
6-36-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Cressy M.
6-36-3
Otte O.
Opelka R.[3]
7-646-2
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Altmaier D.
6-26-4
Basilashvili N.[4]
Ivashka I.
3-66-26-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
Gerasimov E.
6-26-3
Ruud C.[2]
Molcan A.
3-66-46-4
R32
Cressy M.
Evans D.[6]
6-46-4
Gerasimov E.
Millman J.
4-66-26-2
Rune H.
Lehecka J.
7-646-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Nishioka Y.
7-657-5
Otte O.
Topo M.
6-16-2
Gaston H.
Giron M.
6-46-747-5
Tabilo A.
Garin C.[5]
6-36-4
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Rehberg M.
6-26-3
Altmaier D.
Kohlschreiber P.
7-653-66-1
Ivashka I.
Mcdonald M.
6-43-66-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
Nakashima B.
7-636-3
Molcan A.
Gombos N.
6-13-67-67