Jay Clarke vs Elmar Ejupovic — Cuernavaca CH Round of 16

Cuernavaca CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GBR3
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1421Hard ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
hard
GER
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Clarke J.
6-7 6-3 7-6
Ejupovic E.
Clarke J.
636772
Ejupovic E.
773641

Jay Clarke defeated Elmar Ejupovic 6-7 6-3 7-6 in the Cuernavaca CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Clarke J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Ejupovic E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Clarke J.Ejupovic E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.9
7.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clarke J.Ejupovic E.
Clutch Rating·Even
8
7
Break points saved·Dominant
63
88
Break points won·Clear edge
21
1
Deciding sets·Slight edge
10
0
Tiebreaks·Even
4
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Clarke J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ejupovic E.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
3.6
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
3.0
4.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Clarke J.[3]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-14-67-65
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Hijikata R.[8]
6-27-5
Menendez Maceiras A.
Chung Y.
1-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Chung Y.
Smith K.
6-16-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Escobedo E.[1]
6-17-63
Hijikata R.[8]
Diez S.
6-06-1
Clarke J.[3]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
R16
Menendez Maceiras A.
Lock B.
6-26-3
Escobedo E.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
7-626-4
Clarke J.[3]
Ejupovic E.
6-736-37-64
Quiroz R.
Mejia N.
6-47-65
Diez S.
Mochizuki S.
7-626-3
Hijikata R.[8]
Jaziri M.
6-06-2
Smith K.
Hernandez Serrano J.
7-56-4
Chung Y.
Kovacevic A.
3-67-56-4
R32
Menendez Maceiras A.
Schnur B.[5]
5-77-632-1
Ejupovic E.
Oliveira G.
6-30-0
Escobedo E.[1]
Istomin D.
6-46-4
Diez S.
Nakagawa N.
6-26-1
Hijikata R.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-2
Smith K.
Sun F.
6-46-2
Chung Y.
Tomic B.
6-33-66-4
Mejia N.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Jaziri M.
Krstin P.
5-76-17-62
Quiroz R.
Jauregui Sainz De Rozas R.
6-26-2
Mochizuki S.
Van Rijthoven T.[2]
2-67-626-4
Lock B.
Mansouri S.
6-46-2
Clarke J.[3]
Durasovic V.
6-45-76-3
Kovacevic A.
Ficovich J.[4]
3-66-47-5
Gunneswaran P.
Hemery C.
7-6104-66-3
Hernandez Serrano J.
Sugita Y.[7]
6-33-1