Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Andrea Collarini — Buenos Aires CH Final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG3
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
Andrea Collarini
ARG
Andrea Collarini
#340ATP
1426ELO
1411Clay ELO
34 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLWL
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-5 6-2
Collarini A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
762
Collarini A.
520

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Andrea Collarini 7-5 6-2 in the Buenos Aires CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #58, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Collarini A.

Collarini A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Collarini A.
24
Serve
—
28
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Collarini A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
1.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Collarini A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
11
Break points saved·Dominant
90
54
Break points won·Clear edge
62
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Collarini A.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.1+330 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.9Clay Elo 1411
9.0Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
1.0Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
0.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Collarini A.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
6-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Collarini A.
7-56-2
Comesana F.[3]
Navone M.
6-46-0
Cerundolo J.
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
6-42-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Lama G.[4]
6-16-3
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-1
Collarini A.
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Varillas J.[2]
3-66-16-0
Navone M.
Jaziri M.[7]
7-56-0
Comesana F.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
6-36-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Popko D.
6-26-1
Cerundolo J.
Navone M.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Casanova H.[5]
7-56-4
Lama G.[4]
Pereira J.
6-716-16-4
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-36-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Varillas J.[2]
Comesana F.
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Olivieri G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
7-646-3
Collarini A.
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
1-66-26-2
Jaziri M.[7]
Villanueva G.[4]
6-21-66-3
Comesana F.[3]
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-26-1
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Ficovich J.[1]
3-66-06-3
Popko D.
Burruchaga R.
7-50-66-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Olivo R.
6-34-66-2
Navone M.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.
Bagnis F.[5]
6-46-2
R16
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Paz J.
7-57-65
Casanova H.[5]
Rubin N.
6-32-66-2
Pereira J.
Gomez F.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Navone M.
6-36-2
Burruchaga R.
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
6-04-67-64
Dellien Velasco M.
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-16-1
Lama G.[4]
Torres J.
3-66-36-3
Villanueva G.
Olivieri G.[3]
6-46-1
Comesana F.
Darderi L.
7-656-4
Villanueva G.
Burruchaga R.
7-56-1
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-16-3
Collarini A.
Olivo R.[4]
4-66-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
Domingues J.
6-46-3
Varillas J.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
7-56-4
Olivieri G.
Bagnis F.[1]
7-646-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.[5]
4-66-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-41-66-4
Navone M.
Hardt N.[6]
6-14-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Juarez F.
6-16-1
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-2
Villanueva G.[4]
Andreozzi G.
7-636-2
Comesana F.[3]
Otegui J.
7-56-2
Jaziri M.[7]
Galarza J.
7-687-66
Olivo R.
Hanfmann Y.[8]
W/O
Burruchaga R.
Altmaier D.[2]
7-667-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Otegui J.
6-20-66-4
Navone M.
Sanchez Jover C.
4-66-36-1
Bagnis F.[5]
Torres J.
6-16-4
Popko D.
Leite W.
6-46-3
Cerundolo J.
Casanova H.
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Darderi L.
7-56-3
R32
Navone M.
Kestelboim M.
7-55-3
Gomez F.
Vidal Azorin J.
3-67-627-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Rosenkranz M.
6-33-66-3
Rubin N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-656-2
Casanova H.[5]
Juarez F.
6-46-1
Lama G.[4]
Franco Descotte M.
7-57-64
Torres J.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Olivieri G.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-45-76-2
Lipovsek Puches T.
Aboian V.
6-27-63
Dellien Velasco M.
Andreozzi G.[1]
6-36-2
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-41-66-3
Paz J.
Aboian L.
6-37-5
Burruchaga R.
La Serna J.
6-17-65
Villanueva G.
Deckers A.
7-626-4
Pereira J.
Darderi L.[8]
6-47-63
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Torres J.
7-617-5
Varillas J.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Casanova H.
6-26-1
Darderi L.
Kicker N.[6]
6-26-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Juarez F.
6-26-4
Burruchaga R.
Egea F.
6-26-1
Collarini A.
Lama G.
7-56-3
Olivo R.[4]
Janvier M.
7-676-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
De La Fuente S.
7-606-4
Domingues J.
Galarza J.
6-46-736-2
Olivieri G.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-34-66-1
Bagnis F.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
2-66-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Cukierman D.
6-33-66-1
Villanueva G.
Menezes J.[8]
3-66-46-3
Comesana F.
Rodriguez C.
7-677-61
Lingua Lavallen A.
Heide G.
7-677-63
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-66
Franco Descotte M.
Perchicot M.
6-36-1
Quiroz R.[5]
Monzon I.
6-16-4
Comesana F.[3]
Alvarez N.
6-26-746-3
Otegui J.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-13-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Mejia N.
6-06-1
Jaziri M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-40-67-5
Andreozzi G.
Zhu E.
6-17-5
Juarez F.
Farjat T.
6-06-4
Ficovich J.[1]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-756-47-62
Reis Da Silva J.
Barrena A.
6-31-66-4
Navone M.
Aboian V.
6-43-66-3
Villanueva G.[4]
Aboian L.
6-41-66-1
Hardt N.[6]
Tenti F.
6-16-1
Galarza J.
Leite W.
7-626-3
Cerundolo J.
Alvarez N.
6-36-3
Casanova H.
Collarini A.
6-45-76-3
Leite W.
Midon L.
4-66-36-1
Popko D.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
7-680-67-5
Olivo R.
Kicker N.
6-35-76-4
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Villanueva G.
6-26-4
Sanchez Jover C.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-46-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Nagal S.
5-77-647-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-26-2
Otegui J.
Monzon I.
5-76-47-64
Altmaier D.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-46-3
Burruchaga R.
Juarez F.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.[5]
Tirante T.
6-16-4
Navone M.
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
6-26-4
Torres J.
Olivieri G.
7-613-66-3
Darderi L.
Coria F.[1]
6-27-64