Daniel Cukierman vs Tristan Boyer — Buenos Aires CH Qualifying Round 1
Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
#164ATP
1561ELO
1545Clay ELO
$105kYTD
$960kCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Cukierman D.5-7 6-1 6-4
Boyer T.
Cukierman D.
5662
Boyer T.
7141
Daniel Cukierman defeated Tristan Boyer 5-7 6-1 6-4 in the Buenos Aires CH qualifying round 1 on clay.
Key context
- Match story: Daniel Cukierman dropped the opening set before beating Tristan Boyer 5–7 6–1 6–4.
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Boyer T.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
2.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
3
43
Break points saved·Dominant
12
83
Break points won·Dominant
47
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
31
7
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Umpiry Score
Pre-match3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited- Extended break: 416 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
0.0
Win streakFatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Deckers A.[11]
Carou I.[6]
6-32-67-64
Aboian L.[7]
Boscardin Dias P.[4]
6-41-67-63
Dellien Velasco M.[8]
Huertas Del Pino C.[3]
6-36-3
Pereira J.[2]
Justo G.[12]
6-36-0
Gomez F.[10]
Leite W.[1]
6-46-3
Egea F.[6]
Panta Herreros J.[11]
6-36-766-0
Dellien Velasco M.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.[8]
4-66-36-4
Huertas Del Pino C.[5]
Kestelboim M.[7]
6-706-16-1
Cukierman D.[4]
Otegui J.
7-56-3
Galarza J.
Carou I.[9]
5-77-51-0
De La Fuente S.
Farjat T.[10]
6-04-67-65
Farjat T.[8]
Panta Herreros J.[5]
4-66-36-2
Aboian L.[10]
Lopez Linquet L.
3-66-27-61
Galarza J.[11]
Carou I.[4]
6-46-4
Tenti F.[9]
Franco T.
6-16-1
Andreozzi G.[2]
De La Fuente S.
6-37-64
Alvarez N.[2]
Lingua Lavallen A.[12]
1-66-16-4
Leite W.
Sanchez Jover C.[5]
7-56-746-3
Casanova H.[1]
Paul J.
7-656-1
Juarez F.[3]
Rincon D.[11]
5-76-27-68
Monzon I.
Egea F.
2-67-57-5
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Reis Da Silva J.[9]
6-46-4
Q1
Dellien Velasco M.[8]
Lopez Linquet L.
6-46-1
Deckers A.[11]
Gagliardo L.
7-644-66-4
Carou I.[6]
Carraro L.
6-26-4
Gomez F.[10]
Hess S.
6-26-2
De La Fuente S.
Boscardin Dias P.[2]
6-16-1
Galarza J.
Navone M.[3]
6-26-0
Panta Herreros J.[11]
Franco T.
7-56-3
Egea F.[6]
Cigarran T.
6-26-1
Kestelboim M.[7]
Estevez M.
6-16-4
Huertas Del Pino C.[5]
Moreno F.
6-46-1
Otegui J.
Martinez M.[12]
2-66-36-4
Cukierman D.[4]
Boyer T.
5-76-16-4
Lipovsek Puches T.[8]
Brown P.
7-646-4
Dellien Velasco M.[1]
Lopez Linquet L.
6-36-4
Carou I.[4]
Hess S.
6-767-56-4
Farjat T.[8]
Rodriguez L.
6-31-67-65
Franco T.
Loureiro J.
4-67-656-4
Panta Herreros J.[5]
Tacchi L.
6-717-56-3
De La Fuente S.
Baker B.[12]
6-36-3
Lopez Linquet L.
Gomez F.[6]
6-36-4
Galarza J.[11]
Estevarena J.
6-06-1
Tenti F.[9]
Justo G.
6-26-2
Andreozzi G.[2]
Eli N.
6-16-0
Nakagawa N.[1]
Cigarran T.
6-736-26-3
Sanchez Jover C.[5]
Barrena A.
6-16-2
Leite W.
Pereira J.[7]
7-56-3
Paul J.
Cuevas M.[8]
6-34-67-5
Casanova H.[1]
Farjat T.
3-67-56-3
Monzon I.
Aboian L.[10]
4-66-47-5
Egea F.
Paz J.[6]
6-36-3
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Tenti F.
6-26-3
Rincon D.[11]
Franco Descotte M.
2-66-16-4
Juarez F.[3]
Ribeiro E.
6-26-716-4
Lingua Lavallen A.[12]
Kestelboim M.
7-56-3