Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Facundo Diaz Acosta — Buenos Aires CH Round of 16

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG3
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#59ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#120ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-3 6-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Ugo Carabelli C.
662
Diaz Acosta F.
320

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Facundo Diaz Acosta 6-3 6-2 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #59, leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 32. Camilo Ugo Carabelli extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-27SantiagoQ1clayCamilo Ugo Carabelli6-4 6-4
2021-02-22CordobaQ2clayCamilo Ugo Carabelli4-6 6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Diaz Acosta F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Diaz Acosta F.
24
Serve
—
36
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Diaz Acosta F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Diaz Acosta F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
78
58
Break points saved·Even
90
89
Break points won·Dominant
62
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
67
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Diaz Acosta F.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 91 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.0+72 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Clay Elo 1668
7.1Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1681
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.7
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Diaz Acosta F.
Freshness·Dominant
98
47

Ugo Carabelli C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Diaz Acosta F.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
6-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Collarini A.
7-56-2
Comesana F.[3]
Navone M.
6-46-0
Cerundolo J.
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
6-42-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Lama G.[4]
6-16-3
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-1
Collarini A.
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Varillas J.[2]
3-66-16-0
Navone M.
Jaziri M.[7]
7-56-0
Comesana F.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
6-36-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Popko D.
6-26-1
Cerundolo J.
Navone M.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Casanova H.[5]
7-56-4
Lama G.[4]
Pereira J.
6-716-16-4
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-36-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Varillas J.[2]
Comesana F.
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Olivieri G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
7-646-3
Collarini A.
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
1-66-26-2
Jaziri M.[7]
Villanueva G.[4]
6-21-66-3
Comesana F.[3]
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-26-1
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Ficovich J.[1]
3-66-06-3
Popko D.
Burruchaga R.
7-50-66-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Olivo R.
6-34-66-2
Navone M.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.
Bagnis F.[5]
6-46-2
R16
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Paz J.
7-57-65
Casanova H.[5]
Rubin N.
6-32-66-2
Pereira J.
Gomez F.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Navone M.
6-36-2
Burruchaga R.
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
6-04-67-64
Dellien Velasco M.
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-16-1
Lama G.[4]
Torres J.
3-66-36-3
Villanueva G.
Olivieri G.[3]
6-46-1
Comesana F.
Darderi L.
7-656-4
Villanueva G.
Burruchaga R.
7-56-1
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-16-3
Collarini A.
Olivo R.[4]
4-66-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
Domingues J.
6-46-3
Varillas J.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
7-56-4
Olivieri G.
Bagnis F.[1]
7-646-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.[5]
4-66-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-41-66-4
Navone M.
Hardt N.[6]
6-14-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Juarez F.
6-16-1
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-2
Villanueva G.[4]
Andreozzi G.
7-636-2
Comesana F.[3]
Otegui J.
7-56-2
Jaziri M.[7]
Galarza J.
7-687-66
Olivo R.
Hanfmann Y.[8]
W/O
Burruchaga R.
Altmaier D.[2]
7-667-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Otegui J.
6-20-66-4
Navone M.
Sanchez Jover C.
4-66-36-1
Bagnis F.[5]
Torres J.
6-16-4
Popko D.
Leite W.
6-46-3
Cerundolo J.
Casanova H.
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Darderi L.
7-56-3
R32
Navone M.
Kestelboim M.
7-55-3
Gomez F.
Vidal Azorin J.
3-67-627-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Rosenkranz M.
6-33-66-3
Rubin N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-656-2
Casanova H.[5]
Juarez F.
6-46-1
Lama G.[4]
Franco Descotte M.
7-57-64
Torres J.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Olivieri G.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-45-76-2
Lipovsek Puches T.
Aboian V.
6-27-63
Dellien Velasco M.
Andreozzi G.[1]
6-36-2
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-41-66-3
Paz J.
Aboian L.
6-37-5
Burruchaga R.
La Serna J.
6-17-65
Villanueva G.
Deckers A.
7-626-4
Pereira J.
Darderi L.[8]
6-47-63
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Torres J.
7-617-5
Varillas J.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Casanova H.
6-26-1
Darderi L.
Kicker N.[6]
6-26-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Juarez F.
6-26-4
Burruchaga R.
Egea F.
6-26-1
Collarini A.
Lama G.
7-56-3
Olivo R.[4]
Janvier M.
7-676-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
De La Fuente S.
7-606-4
Domingues J.
Galarza J.
6-46-736-2
Olivieri G.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-34-66-1
Bagnis F.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
2-66-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Cukierman D.
6-33-66-1
Villanueva G.
Menezes J.[8]
3-66-46-3
Comesana F.
Rodriguez C.
7-677-61
Lingua Lavallen A.
Heide G.
7-677-63
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-66
Franco Descotte M.
Perchicot M.
6-36-1
Quiroz R.[5]
Monzon I.
6-16-4
Comesana F.[3]
Alvarez N.
6-26-746-3
Otegui J.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-13-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Mejia N.
6-06-1
Jaziri M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-40-67-5
Andreozzi G.
Zhu E.
6-17-5
Juarez F.
Farjat T.
6-06-4
Ficovich J.[1]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-756-47-62
Reis Da Silva J.
Barrena A.
6-31-66-4
Navone M.
Aboian V.
6-43-66-3
Villanueva G.[4]
Aboian L.
6-41-66-1
Hardt N.[6]
Tenti F.
6-16-1
Galarza J.
Leite W.
7-626-3
Cerundolo J.
Alvarez N.
6-36-3
Casanova H.
Collarini A.
6-45-76-3
Leite W.
Midon L.
4-66-36-1
Popko D.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
7-680-67-5
Olivo R.
Kicker N.
6-35-76-4
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Villanueva G.
6-26-4
Sanchez Jover C.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-46-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Nagal S.
5-77-647-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-26-2
Otegui J.
Monzon I.
5-76-47-64
Altmaier D.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-46-3
Burruchaga R.
Juarez F.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.[5]
Tirante T.
6-16-4
Navone M.
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
6-26-4
Torres J.
Olivieri G.
7-613-66-3
Darderi L.
Coria F.[1]
6-27-64