Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Qiang Wang — Istanbul Round of 32

Istanbul · WTA · Round of 32
Sara Sorribes Tormo
ESP7
Sara Sorribes Tormo
#212WTA
1664ELO
1651Clay ELO
29 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
CHN
Qiang Wang
34 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-3 6-2
Wang Q.
Sorribes Tormo S.
662
Wang Q.
320

Sara Sorribes Tormo defeated Qiang Wang 6-3 6-2 in the Istanbul round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Qiang Wang came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sorribes Tormo S.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Wang Q.

Wang Q.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Sorribes Tormo S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sorribes Tormo S.Wang Q.
1st serve in·Slight edge
72%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
57%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
48%
Service points won·Even
53%
57%
Return points won·Even
48%
44%
Break points saved·Even
51%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
0.5
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 54). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sorribes Tormo S.Wang Q.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
34
27
Break points saved·Dominant
19
46
Break points won·Dominant
99
74
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
46
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
5
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sorribes Tormo S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Wang Q.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
7.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
6.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sorribes Tormo S.Wang Q.
Freshness·
97
—

Sorribes Tormo S.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Potapova A.
Kudermetova V.[3]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Kudermetova V.[3]
Cirstea S.[2]
6-36-3
Potapova A.
Putintseva Y.
2-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Cirstea S.[2]
Grabher J.
7-56-1
Kudermetova V.[3]
Bondar A.
7-697-63
Putintseva Y.
Tomljanovic A.[6]
5-76-26-4
Potapova A.
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-26-2
R16
Kudermetova V.[3]
Bogdan A.
W/O
Potapova A.
Martic P.
6-26-3
Putintseva Y.
Peterson R.
6-26-0
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Tsurenko L.
6-41-0
Grabher J.
Teichmann J.[5]
6-46-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Gracheva V.
6-26-1
Bondar A.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-46-2
Cirstea S.[2]
Rus A.
3-66-17-5
R32
Peterson R.
Mertens E.[1]
7-54-1
Cirstea S.[2]
Rakhimova K.
6-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Linette M.
7-666-4
Martic P.
Kalinina A.[4]
3-67-57-65
Bondar A.
Martincova T.[8]
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Trevisan M.
7-667-5
Gracheva V.
Bouzkova M.
6-37-5
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Wang Q.
6-36-2
Potapova A.
Bartunkova N.
6-16-4
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Fourlis J.
6-16-3
Grabher J.
Ozgen P.
7-56-2
Kudermetova V.[3]
Melnikova M.
6-26-0
Bogdan A.
Konjuh A.
6-46-3
Teichmann J.[5]
Minnen G.
6-36-726-3
Rus A.
Oz I.
6-36-1
Tsurenko L.
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-2