Lesia Tsurenko vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova — Istanbul Round of 32

Istanbul · WTA · Round of 32
UKR
Lesia Tsurenko
37 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
SVK
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova
31 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Tsurenko L.
6-0 6-2
Schmiedlova A.
Tsurenko L.
662
Schmiedlova A.
020

Lesia Tsurenko defeated Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 6-0 6-2 in the Istanbul round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Lesia Tsurenko came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lesia Tsurenko extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-10-19MoscowR16hardLesia Tsurenko7-6(5) 4-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Tsurenko L.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Schmiedlova A.

Schmiedlova A.serving47% hold

wins 49% of points on serve vs Tsurenko L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tsurenko L.Schmiedlova A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
58%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
44%
Service points won·Even
53%
54%
Return points won·Even
49%
45%
Break points saved·Even
53%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.2
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 160). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tsurenko L.Schmiedlova A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
64
48
Break points saved·Clear edge
37
20
Break points won·Slight edge
94
85
Deciding sets·Even
90
88
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
85
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tsurenko L.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Schmiedlova A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
4.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Potapova A.
Kudermetova V.[3]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Kudermetova V.[3]
Cirstea S.[2]
6-36-3
Potapova A.
Putintseva Y.
2-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Cirstea S.[2]
Grabher J.
7-56-1
Kudermetova V.[3]
Bondar A.
7-697-63
Putintseva Y.
Tomljanovic A.[6]
5-76-26-4
Potapova A.
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-26-2
R16
Kudermetova V.[3]
Bogdan A.
W/O
Potapova A.
Martic P.
6-26-3
Putintseva Y.
Peterson R.
6-26-0
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Tsurenko L.
6-41-0
Grabher J.
Teichmann J.[5]
6-46-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Gracheva V.
6-26-1
Bondar A.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-46-2
Cirstea S.[2]
Rus A.
3-66-17-5
R32
Peterson R.
Mertens E.[1]
7-54-1
Cirstea S.[2]
Rakhimova K.
6-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Linette M.
7-666-4
Martic P.
Kalinina A.[4]
3-67-57-65
Bondar A.
Martincova T.[8]
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Trevisan M.
7-667-5
Gracheva V.
Bouzkova M.
6-37-5
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Wang Q.
6-36-2
Potapova A.
Bartunkova N.
6-16-4
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Fourlis J.
6-16-3
Grabher J.
Ozgen P.
7-56-2
Kudermetova V.[3]
Melnikova M.
6-26-0
Bogdan A.
Konjuh A.
6-46-3
Teichmann J.[5]
Minnen G.
6-36-726-3
Rus A.
Oz I.
6-36-1
Tsurenko L.
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-2