Christopher Oconnell vs Kacper Zuk — Split CH Quarter-final
Split CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
5.2
Surface form2.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3.8
Minutes 14d6.9
4.0
3-set count7.0
6.0
Prev. match6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Oconnell C.
7762
Zuk K.
6320
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form60%1st serve in+3%63%
71%1st serve points won+2%69%
49%2nd serve points won+2%47%
62%Service points won+1%61%
35%Return points won+5%30%
59%Break points saved+6%65%
7.7Aces / match+2.55.2
1.3Double faults / match+1.93.2
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Arnaldi M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-757-606-2
Oconnell C.[3]
Zuk K.[8]
7-636-2
Valkusz M.
Nardi L.
6-47-63
Piros Z.
Shevchenko A.
7-646-2
R16
Valkusz M.
Celikbilek A.[4]
6-16-1
Shevchenko A.
Hoang A.
6-33-66-3
Nardi L.
Sels J.
6-46-0
Zuk K.[8]
Rola B.
6-03-66-2
Arnaboldi A.
Gojo B.
5-76-46-4
Oconnell C.[3]
Klein L.
6-37-5
Arnaldi M.
Ajdukovic D.
5-76-46-4
Piros Z.
Basic M.
6-36-4
R32
Piros Z.
Trungelliti M.[7]
4-2
Rola B.
Mikrut L.
6-34-67-66
Nardi L.
Nikles J.
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Prizmic D.
6-46-0
Zuk K.[8]
Poljicak M.
5-76-26-1
Valkusz M.
Fatic N.
6-06-3
Oconnell C.[3]
Barrere G.
6-26-3
Arnaldi M.
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Hoang A.
Milojevic N.[2]
3-66-46-2
Ajdukovic D.
Kolar Z.[1]
6-46-3
Klein L.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-5
Basic M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-4
Sels J.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-36-1
Celikbilek A.[4]
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Gojo B.
Fabbiano T.[5]
6-36-2
Shevchenko A.
Zekic M.
4-66-36-2