Emilio Nava vs Lucas Pouille — Prague CH Round of 32

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
FRA4
Lucas Pouille
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLW
Nava E.
6-3 6-1
Pouille L.
Nava E.
662
Pouille L.
310

Emilio Nava defeated Lucas Pouille 6-3 6-1 in the Prague CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Pouille L.

Pouille L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Nava E.Pouille L.
23
Serve
—
3
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Pouille L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
67%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.7
6.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Pouille L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
52
74
Break points saved·Even
94
98
Break points won·Clear edge
17
29
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pouille L.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
6.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Pouille L.
Freshness·
100
—

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ofner S.
Svrcina D.
6-06-4
Cachin P.[5]
Giustino L.
6-37-64
Krutykh O.[2]
Gerch L.
6-36-726-2
Semi-finals
Svrcina D.
Machac T.[6]
W/O
Ofner S.
Tseng C.[3]
7-51-66-1
Cachin P.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
2-66-26-3
Giustino L.
Kuzmanov D.
7-644-66-2
Gerch L.
Domingues J.
6-44-66-3
Krutykh O.[2]
Mensik J.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Ofner S.
Forejtek J.
6-27-65
Tseng C.[3]
Barranco Cosano J.
2-66-37-63
Machac T.[6]
Rosol L.
7-636-0
Svrcina D.
Giustino L.
6-04-1
Blancaneaux G.
Tabur C.
6-06-1
Cachin P.[5]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-3
Giustino L.
Gaio F.[8]
6-33-67-67
Kuzmanov D.
Marterer M.
6-16-0
Krutykh O.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.[8]
6-43-67-68
Gerch L.
Gigante M.
7-56-2
Domingues J.
Navone M.
7-636-3
Mensik J.
Cuevas M.
7-56-2
R16
Forejtek J.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-16-4
Rosol L.
Moraing M.[2]
4-66-36-4
Machac T.[6]
Furness E.
3-67-656-4
Svrcina D.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Novak D.[5]
7-692-66-3
Ofner S.
Rodionov J.[8]
6-17-66
Giustino L.
Nava E.
5-77-657-64
Tseng C.[3]
Miedler L.
6-26-2
Marterer M.
Krumich M.
6-36-1
Giustino L.
Donati M.
6-16-3
Blancaneaux G.
Rosol L.
1-66-27-63
Fabbiano T.
Peniston R.
6-14-66-0
Gaio F.[8]
Forejtek J.
7-652-67-5
Tabur C.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-26-4
Kuzmanov D.
Borges N.[2]
6-17-5
Cachin P.[5]
Furness E.
6-06-3
Moreno De Alboran N.[8]
Collignon R.
7-55-77-5
Cuevas M.
Gengel M.
6-06-1
Mensik J.
Rosol L.
6-26-4
Navone M.
Squire H.[5]
7-56-1
Gigante M.
Vrbensky M.
6-26-3
Krutykh O.[2]
Nouza P.
6-36-4
Domingues J.
Sachko V.[3]
7-57-5
Gerch L.
Andreev A.
6-46-4
R32
Furness E.
Muller A.
6-23-0
Tseng C.[3]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Domingues J.
6-21-66-2
Moraing M.[2]
Marterer M.
6-43-67-611
Nava E.
Pouille L.[4]
6-36-1
Novak D.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
7-646-766-4
Miedler L.
Lamasine T.
2-66-26-3
Rodionov J.[8]
Haase R.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Krumich M.
5-77-56-4
Giustino L.
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Forejtek J.
Tiurnev E.
6-36-756-4
Ofner S.
Lestienne C.
6-26-2
Krutykh O.
Popko D.[9]
6-46-1
Svrcina D.
Ionel N.
6-36-4
Rosol L.
Horansky F.
7-656-1
Machac T.[6]
Vrbensky M.
6-33-1
Rosol L.
Sachko V.
6-30-0
Marterer M.
Paulson A.
7-627-66
Borges N.[2]
Bonadio R.
6-26-4
Forejtek J.
Gerch L.
7-54-66-3
Blancaneaux G.
Ficovich J.[7]
6-46-3
Tabur C.
Purcell M.
6-46-3
Peniston R.
Vukic A.[1]
6-16-3
Donati M.
Uchida K.
2-66-46-3
Fabbiano T.
Oliel Y.
2-66-36-2
Kopriva V.[4]
Basic M.
6-36-2
Kuzmanov D.
Marchenko I.
6-16-3
Cachin P.[5]
Svrcina D.
6-36-1
Gaio F.[8]
Michalski D.
6-36-1
Giustino L.
Copil M.
3-67-627-5
Krumich M.
De Jong J.[6]
7-667-66
Furness E.
Ofner S.
7-633-2
Krutykh O.[2]
Copil M.
6-14-67-65
Collignon R.
Gautier A.
6-46-1
Cuevas M.
Krumich M.
2-66-36-3
Squire H.[5]
Neumayer L.
6-16-4
Navone M.
Fils A.
6-46-1
Domingues J.
Vocel M.
6-36-1
Sachko V.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-1
Gerch L.
Ilkel C.[7]
6-46-2
Vrbensky M.
De Schepper K.
7-57-65
Gigante M.
Burruchaga R.
7-652-66-2
Moreno De Alboran N.[8]
Moro Canas A.
6-33-67-5
Gengel M.
Roca Batalla O.[4]
6-46-746-3
Andreev A.
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-3
Nouza P.
Cornea V.
6-36-736-2
Mensik J.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-34-0
Rosol L.
Kirkin E.[6]
4-66-47-61