Tung Lin Wu vs Michael Mmoh — Tallahassee CH Final

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1421Clay ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1508Clay ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Wu T.
6-3 6-4
Mmoh M.
Wu T.
662
Mmoh M.
340

Tung Lin Wu defeated Michael Mmoh 6-3 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #188, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
68%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
91
Break points won·Dominant
6
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.1Clay Elo 1421
Surface ELO
5.9+87 Clay Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1613
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
5.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Clear edge
80
95

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wu T.
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Zhang Z.
6-47-67
Mmoh M.
Galan D.[3]
3-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-27-64
Wu T.
Harrison C.
6-06-4
Zhang Z.
Wolf J.[6]
6-33-67-62
Galan D.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-36-4
R16
Galan D.[3]
Kubler J.
6-17-65
Harrison C.
Krueger M.[7]
6-40-0
Wolf J.[6]
Ritschard A.
7-656-3
Kovacevic A.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
7-646-4
Wu T.
Gomez E.[4]
6-06-716-1
Mmoh M.
Etcheverry T.[1]
4-66-36-3
Zhang Z.
Donskoy E.
7-617-5
Watanuki Y.
Lama G.
7-626-0
R32
Etcheverry T.[1]
Jung J.
6-36-2
Ritschard A.
Mridha J.
6-26-4
Lama G.
Sandgren T.[8]
7-56-737-66
Donskoy E.
Fils A.
6-06-4
Watanuki Y.
Brouwer G.
6-11-67-61
Wolf J.[6]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-655-76-2
Mmoh M.
Nagal S.
6-36-0
Zhang Z.
Johnson S.[2]
2-66-37-5
Kubler J.
Rybakov A.
7-636-3
Krueger M.[7]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-56-4
Harrison C.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[4]
Torpegaard M.
3-67-56-4
Wu T.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Collarini A.
6-46-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Ramanathan R.
6-16-3
Kovacevic A.
Langmo C.
6-27-61