Michael Mmoh vs Sumit Nagal — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1508Clay ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Mmoh M.
6-3 6-0
Nagal S.
Mmoh M.
662
Nagal S.
300

Michael Mmoh defeated Sumit Nagal 6-3 6-0 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #188, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
69
Break points won·Even
31
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
16
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
77
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Nagal S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4Clay Elo 1508
Surface ELO
4.6+29 Clay Elo edge
6.7Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1543
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Nagal S.
Freshness·Even
95
96

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wu T.
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Zhang Z.
6-47-67
Mmoh M.
Galan D.[3]
3-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-27-64
Wu T.
Harrison C.
6-06-4
Zhang Z.
Wolf J.[6]
6-33-67-62
Galan D.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-36-4
R16
Galan D.[3]
Kubler J.
6-17-65
Harrison C.
Krueger M.[7]
6-40-0
Wolf J.[6]
Ritschard A.
7-656-3
Kovacevic A.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
7-646-4
Wu T.
Gomez E.[4]
6-06-716-1
Mmoh M.
Etcheverry T.[1]
4-66-36-3
Zhang Z.
Donskoy E.
7-617-5
Watanuki Y.
Lama G.
7-626-0
R32
Etcheverry T.[1]
Jung J.
6-36-2
Ritschard A.
Mridha J.
6-26-4
Lama G.
Sandgren T.[8]
7-56-737-66
Donskoy E.
Fils A.
6-06-4
Watanuki Y.
Brouwer G.
6-11-67-61
Wolf J.[6]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-655-76-2
Mmoh M.
Nagal S.
6-36-0
Zhang Z.
Johnson S.[2]
2-66-37-5
Kubler J.
Rybakov A.
7-636-3
Krueger M.[7]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-56-4
Harrison C.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[4]
Torpegaard M.
3-67-56-4
Wu T.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Collarini A.
6-46-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Ramanathan R.
6-16-3
Kovacevic A.
Langmo C.
6-27-61