Julia Grabher vs Jil Teichmann — Istanbul Round of 16

Istanbul · WTA · Round of 16
Julia Grabher
AUT
Julia Grabher
#116WTA
1613ELO
1593Clay ELO
30 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
Jil Teichmann
SUI5
Jil Teichmann
#119WTA
1687ELO
1653Clay ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Grabher J.
6-4 6-4
Teichmann J.
Grabher J.
662
Teichmann J.
440

Julia Grabher defeated Jil Teichmann 6-4 6-4 in the Istanbul round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Julia Grabher came in ranked #116. Julia Grabher extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Julia Grabher edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-18RabatR32clayJil Teichmann6-4 7.7-6.5
2023-05-08RomeR64clayJulia Grabher7-6(4) 5-7 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Grabher J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Teichmann J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Grabher J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Grabher J.Teichmann J.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.3
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Grabher J.Teichmann J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
55
50
Break points saved·Dominant
39
71
Break points won·Slight edge
91
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
62
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Grabher J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Teichmann J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.4Clay Elo 1593
Surface ELO
4.6+60 Clay Elo edge
5.0Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1687
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Grabher J.Teichmann J.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
100

Grabher J.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 35 games (7d) · Teichmann J.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Potapova A.
Kudermetova V.[3]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Kudermetova V.[3]
Cirstea S.[2]
6-36-3
Potapova A.
Putintseva Y.
2-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Cirstea S.[2]
Grabher J.
7-56-1
Kudermetova V.[3]
Bondar A.
7-697-63
Putintseva Y.
Tomljanovic A.[6]
5-76-26-4
Potapova A.
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-26-2
R16
Kudermetova V.[3]
Bogdan A.
W/O
Potapova A.
Martic P.
6-26-3
Putintseva Y.
Peterson R.
6-26-0
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Tsurenko L.
6-41-0
Grabher J.
Teichmann J.[5]
6-46-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Gracheva V.
6-26-1
Bondar A.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-46-2
Cirstea S.[2]
Rus A.
3-66-17-5
R32
Peterson R.
Mertens E.[1]
7-54-1
Cirstea S.[2]
Rakhimova K.
6-46-1
Putintseva Y.
Linette M.
7-666-4
Martic P.
Kalinina A.[4]
3-67-57-65
Bondar A.
Martincova T.[8]
6-47-5
Parrizas Diaz N.
Trevisan M.
7-667-5
Gracheva V.
Bouzkova M.
6-37-5
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Wang Q.
6-36-2
Potapova A.
Bartunkova N.
6-16-4
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Fourlis J.
6-16-3
Grabher J.
Ozgen P.
7-56-2
Kudermetova V.[3]
Melnikova M.
6-26-0
Bogdan A.
Konjuh A.
6-46-3
Teichmann J.[5]
Minnen G.
6-36-726-3
Rus A.
Oz I.
6-36-1
Tsurenko L.
Schmiedlova A.
6-06-2