Tung Lin Wu vs Emilio Gomez — Tallahassee CH Round of 16

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1421Clay ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
ECU4
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Wu T.
6-0 6-7 6-1
Gomez E.
Wu T.
66162
Gomez E.
07711

Tung Lin Wu defeated Emilio Gomez 6-0 6-7 6-1 in the Tallahassee CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Gomez came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tung Lin Wu claimed a first win over Emilio Gomez in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-13Delray BeachR32hardEmilio Gomez7-6(3) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
77
Break points won·Clear edge
6
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
6
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
9.07-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
4.9
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Gomez E.
Freshness·
80
—

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wu T.
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Zhang Z.
6-47-67
Mmoh M.
Galan D.[3]
3-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-27-64
Wu T.
Harrison C.
6-06-4
Zhang Z.
Wolf J.[6]
6-33-67-62
Galan D.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-36-4
R16
Galan D.[3]
Kubler J.
6-17-65
Harrison C.
Krueger M.[7]
6-40-0
Wolf J.[6]
Ritschard A.
7-656-3
Kovacevic A.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
7-646-4
Wu T.
Gomez E.[4]
6-06-716-1
Mmoh M.
Etcheverry T.[1]
4-66-36-3
Zhang Z.
Donskoy E.
7-617-5
Watanuki Y.
Lama G.
7-626-0
R32
Etcheverry T.[1]
Jung J.
6-36-2
Ritschard A.
Mridha J.
6-26-4
Lama G.
Sandgren T.[8]
7-56-737-66
Donskoy E.
Fils A.
6-06-4
Watanuki Y.
Brouwer G.
6-11-67-61
Wolf J.[6]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-655-76-2
Mmoh M.
Nagal S.
6-36-0
Zhang Z.
Johnson S.[2]
2-66-37-5
Kubler J.
Rybakov A.
7-636-3
Krueger M.[7]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-56-4
Harrison C.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-3
Gomez E.[4]
Torpegaard M.
3-67-56-4
Wu T.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Collarini A.
6-46-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Ramanathan R.
6-16-3
Kovacevic A.
Langmo C.
6-27-61