Mate Valkusz vs Nerman Fatic — Split CH Round of 32

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
HUN
Mate Valkusz
#765ATP
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Valkusz M.
6-0 6-3
Fatic N.
Valkusz M.
662
Fatic N.
030

Mate Valkusz defeated Nerman Fatic 6-0 6-3 in the Split CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Valkusz M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Valkusz M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Valkusz M.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
43%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Valkusz M.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
46
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
50
63
Break points won·Dominant
62
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Valkusz M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fatic N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
5.9
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[3]
Piros Z.
6-32-0
Semi-finals
Piros Z.
Valkusz M.
6-46-2
Oconnell C.[3]
Arnaldi M.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.
Shevchenko A.
7-646-2
Valkusz M.
Nardi L.
6-47-63
Oconnell C.[3]
Zuk K.[8]
7-636-2
Arnaldi M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-757-606-2
R16
Piros Z.
Basic M.
6-36-4
Zuk K.[8]
Rola B.
6-03-66-2
Oconnell C.[3]
Klein L.
6-37-5
Arnaboldi A.
Gojo B.
5-76-46-4
Valkusz M.
Celikbilek A.[4]
6-16-1
Shevchenko A.
Hoang A.
6-33-66-3
Nardi L.
Sels J.
6-46-0
Arnaldi M.
Ajdukovic D.
5-76-46-4
R32
Hoang A.
Milojevic N.[2]
3-66-46-2
Basic M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-4
Celikbilek A.[4]
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Valkusz M.
Fatic N.
6-06-3
Nardi L.
Nikles J.
6-46-3
Sels J.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-36-1
Gojo B.
Fabbiano T.[5]
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Prizmic D.
6-46-0
Ajdukovic D.
Kolar Z.[1]
6-46-3
Rola B.
Mikrut L.
6-34-67-66
Zuk K.[8]
Poljicak M.
5-76-26-1
Oconnell C.[3]
Barrere G.
6-26-3
Arnaldi M.
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Klein L.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-5
Shevchenko A.
Zekic M.
4-66-36-2
Piros Z.
Trungelliti M.[7]
4-2