Mate Valkusz vs Altug Celikbilek — Split CH Round of 16

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
HUN
Mate Valkusz
#765ATP
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
TUR4
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Valkusz M.
6-1 6-1
Celikbilek A.
Valkusz M.
662
Celikbilek A.
110

Mate Valkusz defeated Altug Celikbilek 6-1 6-1 in the Split CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Valkusz M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Valkusz M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Valkusz M.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.2
6.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Valkusz M.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
46
40
Break points saved·Clear edge
50
73
Break points won·Clear edge
62
38
Deciding sets·Slight edge
50
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Valkusz M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Celikbilek A.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.7
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
8.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[3]
Piros Z.
6-32-0
Semi-finals
Piros Z.
Valkusz M.
6-46-2
Oconnell C.[3]
Arnaldi M.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.
Shevchenko A.
7-646-2
Valkusz M.
Nardi L.
6-47-63
Oconnell C.[3]
Zuk K.[8]
7-636-2
Arnaldi M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-757-606-2
R16
Piros Z.
Basic M.
6-36-4
Zuk K.[8]
Rola B.
6-03-66-2
Oconnell C.[3]
Klein L.
6-37-5
Arnaboldi A.
Gojo B.
5-76-46-4
Valkusz M.
Celikbilek A.[4]
6-16-1
Shevchenko A.
Hoang A.
6-33-66-3
Nardi L.
Sels J.
6-46-0
Arnaldi M.
Ajdukovic D.
5-76-46-4
R32
Hoang A.
Milojevic N.[2]
3-66-46-2
Basic M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-4
Celikbilek A.[4]
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Valkusz M.
Fatic N.
6-06-3
Nardi L.
Nikles J.
6-46-3
Sels J.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-36-1
Gojo B.
Fabbiano T.[5]
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Prizmic D.
6-46-0
Ajdukovic D.
Kolar Z.[1]
6-46-3
Rola B.
Mikrut L.
6-34-67-66
Zuk K.[8]
Poljicak M.
5-76-26-1
Oconnell C.[3]
Barrere G.
6-26-3
Arnaldi M.
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Klein L.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-5
Shevchenko A.
Zekic M.
4-66-36-2
Piros Z.
Trungelliti M.[7]
4-2