Arthur Cazaux vs Julian Lenz — Aguascalientes CH Round of 32

Aguascalientes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1703Clay ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
GER
Julian Lenz
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLW
Cazaux A.
6-2 7-6
Lenz J.
Cazaux A.
6772
Lenz J.
2640

Arthur Cazaux defeated Julian Lenz 6-2 7-6 in the Aguascalientes CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Cazaux closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lenz J.

Lenz J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Lenz J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.7
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Lenz J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
12
Break points saved·Dominant
97
40
Break points won·Clear edge
27
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
39
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lenz J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
9.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Huesler M.[3]
Ficovich J.[8]
6-44-66-3
Semi-finals
Huesler M.[3]
Jianu F.
6-37-64
Ficovich J.[8]
Gaio F.[7]
6-767-56-4
Quarter-finals
Ficovich J.[8]
Jarry N.[2]
6-36-2
Gaio F.[7]
Diez S.
6-726-26-3
Jianu F.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-46-3
Huesler M.[3]
Cazaux A.
6-756-37-60
R16
Jarry N.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-4
Ficovich J.[8]
Zukas M.
6-26-3
Gaio F.[7]
Istomin D.
6-46-2
Huesler M.[3]
Mejia N.
3-66-36-4
Jianu F.
Barrientos N.
7-56-2
Menendez Maceiras A.
Tomic B.
7-657-5
Diez S.
Escobedo E.[4]
6-47-63
Cazaux A.
Clarke J.[5]
4-66-46-1
R32
Jarry N.[2]
Balderas D.
6-36-0
Mochizuki S.
Santillan A.
6-36-2
Escobedo E.[4]
Melzer G.
6-33-66-3
Diez S.
Hijikata R.
6-26-4
Istomin D.
Bellier A.
7-635-76-3
Gaio F.[7]
Jubb P.
6-46-1
Cazaux A.
Lenz J.
6-27-64
Mejia N.
Oliveira G.
6-36-4
Barrientos N.
Jaziri M.
6-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Martin A.[1]
4-66-37-5
Jianu F.
Van Rijthoven T.[6]
6-36-4
Ficovich J.[8]
Ejupovic E.
4-66-06-3
Huesler M.[3]
Durasovic V.
6-45-77-5
Clarke J.[5]
Sugita Y.
5-77-56-0
Zukas M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-4
Tomic B.
Shang J.
4-67-642-1