Arthur Cazaux vs Jay Clarke — Aguascalientes CH Round of 16

Aguascalientes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1703Clay ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
GBR5
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1414Clay ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
Cazaux A.
4-6 6-4 6-1
Clarke J.
Cazaux A.
4662
Clarke J.
6411

Arthur Cazaux defeated Jay Clarke 4-6 6-4 6-1 in the Aguascalientes CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Clarke J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Clarke J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Clarke J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
8
Break points saved·Dominant
97
63
Break points won·Slight edge
27
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Clarke J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.8+289 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Clay Elo 1414
9.5Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1458
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
6.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Huesler M.[3]
Ficovich J.[8]
6-44-66-3
Semi-finals
Huesler M.[3]
Jianu F.
6-37-64
Ficovich J.[8]
Gaio F.[7]
6-767-56-4
Quarter-finals
Ficovich J.[8]
Jarry N.[2]
6-36-2
Gaio F.[7]
Diez S.
6-726-26-3
Jianu F.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-46-3
Huesler M.[3]
Cazaux A.
6-756-37-60
R16
Jarry N.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-4
Ficovich J.[8]
Zukas M.
6-26-3
Gaio F.[7]
Istomin D.
6-46-2
Huesler M.[3]
Mejia N.
3-66-36-4
Jianu F.
Barrientos N.
7-56-2
Menendez Maceiras A.
Tomic B.
7-657-5
Diez S.
Escobedo E.[4]
6-47-63
Cazaux A.
Clarke J.[5]
4-66-46-1
R32
Jarry N.[2]
Balderas D.
6-36-0
Mochizuki S.
Santillan A.
6-36-2
Escobedo E.[4]
Melzer G.
6-33-66-3
Diez S.
Hijikata R.
6-26-4
Istomin D.
Bellier A.
7-635-76-3
Gaio F.[7]
Jubb P.
6-46-1
Cazaux A.
Lenz J.
6-27-64
Mejia N.
Oliveira G.
6-36-4
Barrientos N.
Jaziri M.
6-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Martin A.[1]
4-66-37-5
Jianu F.
Van Rijthoven T.[6]
6-36-4
Ficovich J.[8]
Ejupovic E.
4-66-06-3
Huesler M.[3]
Durasovic V.
6-45-77-5
Clarke J.[5]
Sugita Y.
5-77-56-0
Zukas M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-4
Tomic B.
Shang J.
4-67-642-1