Altug Celikbilek vs Riccardo Bonadio — Split CH Round of 32

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
TUR4
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
ITA
Riccardo Bonadio
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Celikbilek A.
6-4 6-2
Bonadio R.
Celikbilek A.
662
Bonadio R.
420

Altug Celikbilek defeated Riccardo Bonadio 6-4 6-2 in the Split CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bonadio R.

Bonadio R.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Bonadio R.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 155). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Bonadio R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
26
Break points saved·Even
73
70
Break points won·Clear edge
38
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
44
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
26
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bonadio R.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
5.2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
5.5
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[3]
Piros Z.
6-32-0
Semi-finals
Piros Z.
Valkusz M.
6-46-2
Oconnell C.[3]
Arnaldi M.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.
Shevchenko A.
7-646-2
Valkusz M.
Nardi L.
6-47-63
Oconnell C.[3]
Zuk K.[8]
7-636-2
Arnaldi M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-757-606-2
R16
Piros Z.
Basic M.
6-36-4
Zuk K.[8]
Rola B.
6-03-66-2
Oconnell C.[3]
Klein L.
6-37-5
Arnaboldi A.
Gojo B.
5-76-46-4
Valkusz M.
Celikbilek A.[4]
6-16-1
Shevchenko A.
Hoang A.
6-33-66-3
Nardi L.
Sels J.
6-46-0
Arnaldi M.
Ajdukovic D.
5-76-46-4
R32
Hoang A.
Milojevic N.[2]
3-66-46-2
Basic M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-4
Celikbilek A.[4]
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Valkusz M.
Fatic N.
6-06-3
Nardi L.
Nikles J.
6-46-3
Sels J.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-36-1
Gojo B.
Fabbiano T.[5]
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Prizmic D.
6-46-0
Ajdukovic D.
Kolar Z.[1]
6-46-3
Rola B.
Mikrut L.
6-34-67-66
Zuk K.[8]
Poljicak M.
5-76-26-1
Oconnell C.[3]
Barrere G.
6-26-3
Arnaldi M.
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Klein L.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-5
Shevchenko A.
Zekic M.
4-66-36-2
Piros Z.
Trungelliti M.[7]
4-2