Mohamed Safwat vs Jakub Paul — San Luis Potosi CH Qualifying Round 1

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
EGY9
Mohamed Safwat
#1884ATP
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
SUI
Jakub Paul
#543ATP
1389ELO
1348Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Safwat M.
6-2 6-4
Paul J.
Safwat M.
662
Paul J.
240

Mohamed Safwat defeated Jakub Paul 6-2 6-4 in the San Luis Potosi CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Safwat M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Paul J.

Paul J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Safwat M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Safwat M.Paul J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
1.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Safwat M.Paul J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
8
21
Break points saved·Even
64
62
Break points won·Clear edge
2
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
17
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
21
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Safwat M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Paul J.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
3.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
6.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Habib H.[12]
Ejupovic E.
2-66-47-65
Soares Klier Junior G.[11]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
Quiroz R.[4]
Alves M.
7-54-66-1
Zukas M.
Safwat M.[9]
3-66-36-4
Bellier A.
Santillan A.[8]
6-33-66-0
Shang J.
Smith K.
7-636-747-5
Q1
Habib H.[12]
Sanchez M.
7-56-3
Ejupovic E.
Decamps G.[5]
6-37-65
Zukas M.
Mansouri S.[3]
6-27-62
Smith K.
Menendez Maceiras A.[1]
7-676-3
Chappell N.
Aragone J.[6]
7-56-1
Alves M.
Dougaz A.[10]
6-26-3
Quiroz R.[4]
Patino L.
6-26-2
Safwat M.[9]
Paul J.
6-26-4
Bellier A.
Hemery C.[2]
7-655-77-65
Shang J.
Mukund S.[7]
6-34-66-3