Andrej Martin vs Nicola Kuhn — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 16

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SVK1
Andrej Martin
#402ATP
1470ELO
1444Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
GER
Nicola Kuhn
#1540ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Martin A.
2-6 6-4 6-4
Kuhn N.
Martin A.
2662
Kuhn N.
6441

Andrej Martin defeated Nicola Kuhn 2-6 6-4 6-4 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kuhn N.

Kuhn N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martin A.Kuhn N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 50). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Martin A.Kuhn N.
Clutch Rating·Even
12
14
Break points saved·Even
54
56
Break points won·Slight edge
25
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
23
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
9
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kuhn N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
2.2
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
7.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellier A.
Olivo R.[8]
6-726-47-5
Semi-finals
Olivo R.[8]
Jarry N.[2]
6-36-2
Bellier A.
Huesler M.[6]
2-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bellier A.
Martin A.[1]
6-36-4
Olivo R.[8]
Escobedo E.[3]
6-42-66-4
Huesler M.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-43-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-47-5
R16
Zhang Z.
Mejia N.
7-56-746-3
Olivo R.[8]
Oliveira G.
5-76-36-2
Huesler M.[6]
Shang J.
6-47-66
Bellier A.
Gaio F.[7]
6-31-66-3
Martin A.[1]
Kuhn N.
2-66-46-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Istomin D.
6-44-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-766-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Clarke J.[5]
6-46-0
R32
Clarke J.[5]
Zukas M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-2
Gaio F.[7]
Krstin P.
6-22-67-5
Jarry N.[2]
Melzer G.
2-66-37-64
Istomin D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-736-16-3
Oliveira G.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-5
Huesler M.[6]
Quiroz R.
7-616-3
Shang J.
Habib H.
4-67-616-2
Zhang Z.
Mena F.[4]
7-636-1
Martin A.[1]
Lenz J.
6-16-1
Soares Klier Junior G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-676-4
Mejia N.
Durasovic V.
7-56-737-63
Bellier A.
Jianu F.
6-33-67-5
Kuhn N.
Ficovich J.
7-625-76-3
Olivo R.[8]
Cazaux A.
6-43-66-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Donskoy E.
7-626-3