Juncheng Shang vs Hady Habib — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1640Clay ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
LIB
Hady Habib
#650ATP
1412ELO
1435Clay ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Shang J.
4-6 7-6 6-2
Habib H.
Shang J.
47762
Habib H.
66121

Juncheng Shang defeated Hady Habib 4-6 7-6 6-2 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Habib H.

Habib H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Habib H.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.7
8.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Habib H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
44
Break points saved·Even
96
92
Break points won·Dominant
45
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
56
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Habib H.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
7.6+205 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1435
9.2Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
0.8Overall Elo 1412
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
1.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellier A.
Olivo R.[8]
6-726-47-5
Semi-finals
Olivo R.[8]
Jarry N.[2]
6-36-2
Bellier A.
Huesler M.[6]
2-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bellier A.
Martin A.[1]
6-36-4
Olivo R.[8]
Escobedo E.[3]
6-42-66-4
Huesler M.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-43-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-47-5
R16
Zhang Z.
Mejia N.
7-56-746-3
Olivo R.[8]
Oliveira G.
5-76-36-2
Huesler M.[6]
Shang J.
6-47-66
Bellier A.
Gaio F.[7]
6-31-66-3
Martin A.[1]
Kuhn N.
2-66-46-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Istomin D.
6-44-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-766-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Clarke J.[5]
6-46-0
R32
Clarke J.[5]
Zukas M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-2
Gaio F.[7]
Krstin P.
6-22-67-5
Jarry N.[2]
Melzer G.
2-66-37-64
Istomin D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-736-16-3
Oliveira G.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-5
Huesler M.[6]
Quiroz R.
7-616-3
Shang J.
Habib H.
4-67-616-2
Zhang Z.
Mena F.[4]
7-636-1
Martin A.[1]
Lenz J.
6-16-1
Soares Klier Junior G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-676-4
Mejia N.
Durasovic V.
7-56-737-63
Bellier A.
Jianu F.
6-33-67-5
Kuhn N.
Ficovich J.
7-625-76-3
Olivo R.[8]
Cazaux A.
6-43-66-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Donskoy E.
7-626-3