Federico Gaio vs Pedja Krstin — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA7
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
SRB
Pedja Krstin
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
Gaio F.
6-2 2-6 7-5
Krstin P.
Gaio F.
6272
Krstin P.
2651

Federico Gaio defeated Pedja Krstin 6-2 2-6 7-5 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Gaio closed it out in three sets, 6–2 2–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaio F.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Krstin P.

Krstin P.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Serve advantage — Gaio F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaio F.Krstin P.
1st serve in·Even
57%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
50%
Aces / match·Even
4.6
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (127 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaio F.Krstin P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
20
0
Break points saved·Dominant
76
27
Break points won·Clear edge
3
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
4
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
7
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaio F.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Krstin P.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
4.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellier A.
Olivo R.[8]
6-726-47-5
Semi-finals
Olivo R.[8]
Jarry N.[2]
6-36-2
Bellier A.
Huesler M.[6]
2-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bellier A.
Martin A.[1]
6-36-4
Olivo R.[8]
Escobedo E.[3]
6-42-66-4
Huesler M.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-43-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-47-5
R16
Zhang Z.
Mejia N.
7-56-746-3
Olivo R.[8]
Oliveira G.
5-76-36-2
Huesler M.[6]
Shang J.
6-47-66
Bellier A.
Gaio F.[7]
6-31-66-3
Martin A.[1]
Kuhn N.
2-66-46-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Istomin D.
6-44-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-766-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Clarke J.[5]
6-46-0
R32
Clarke J.[5]
Zukas M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-2
Gaio F.[7]
Krstin P.
6-22-67-5
Jarry N.[2]
Melzer G.
2-66-37-64
Istomin D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-736-16-3
Oliveira G.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-5
Huesler M.[6]
Quiroz R.
7-616-3
Shang J.
Habib H.
4-67-616-2
Zhang Z.
Mena F.[4]
7-636-1
Martin A.[1]
Lenz J.
6-16-1
Soares Klier Junior G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-676-4
Mejia N.
Durasovic V.
7-56-737-63
Bellier A.
Jianu F.
6-33-67-5
Kuhn N.
Ficovich J.
7-625-76-3
Olivo R.[8]
Cazaux A.
6-43-66-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Donskoy E.
7-626-3