Ernesto Escobedo vs Denis Istomin — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 16

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
MEX3
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
UZB
Denis Istomin
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Escobedo E.
6-4 4-6 6-3
Istomin D.
Escobedo E.
6462
Istomin D.
4631

Ernesto Escobedo defeated Denis Istomin 6-4 4-6 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 16 on clay. Ernesto Escobedo extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersQ1hardErnesto Escobedo6-3 6-2
2017-05-29Roland GarrosR128clayDenis Istomin7-6(3) 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Escobedo E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Istomin D.

Istomin D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Serve advantage — Escobedo E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escobedo E.Istomin D.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Even
5.2
4.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (121 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escobedo E.Istomin D.
Clutch Rating·Even
28
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
90
Break points won·Slight edge
12
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escobedo E.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Istomin D.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellier A.
Olivo R.[8]
6-726-47-5
Semi-finals
Olivo R.[8]
Jarry N.[2]
6-36-2
Bellier A.
Huesler M.[6]
2-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bellier A.
Martin A.[1]
6-36-4
Olivo R.[8]
Escobedo E.[3]
6-42-66-4
Huesler M.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-43-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-47-5
R16
Zhang Z.
Mejia N.
7-56-746-3
Olivo R.[8]
Oliveira G.
5-76-36-2
Huesler M.[6]
Shang J.
6-47-66
Bellier A.
Gaio F.[7]
6-31-66-3
Martin A.[1]
Kuhn N.
2-66-46-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Istomin D.
6-44-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-766-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Clarke J.[5]
6-46-0
R32
Clarke J.[5]
Zukas M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-2
Gaio F.[7]
Krstin P.
6-22-67-5
Jarry N.[2]
Melzer G.
2-66-37-64
Istomin D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-736-16-3
Oliveira G.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-5
Huesler M.[6]
Quiroz R.
7-616-3
Shang J.
Habib H.
4-67-616-2
Zhang Z.
Mena F.[4]
7-636-1
Martin A.[1]
Lenz J.
6-16-1
Soares Klier Junior G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-676-4
Mejia N.
Durasovic V.
7-56-737-63
Bellier A.
Jianu F.
6-33-67-5
Kuhn N.
Ficovich J.
7-625-76-3
Olivo R.[8]
Cazaux A.
6-43-66-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Donskoy E.
7-626-3