Jay Clarke vs Matias Zukas — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR5
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1414Clay ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
ARG
Matias Zukas
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
Clarke J.
6-3 6-4
Zukas M.
Clarke J.
662
Zukas M.
340

Jay Clarke defeated Matias Zukas 6-3 6-4 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Jay Clarke closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Clarke J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zukas M.

Zukas M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Serve advantage — Clarke J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Clarke J.Zukas M.
1st serve in·Even
57%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Even
3.9
3.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Clarke J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zukas M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.3
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellier A.
Olivo R.[8]
6-726-47-5
Semi-finals
Olivo R.[8]
Jarry N.[2]
6-36-2
Bellier A.
Huesler M.[6]
2-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bellier A.
Martin A.[1]
6-36-4
Olivo R.[8]
Escobedo E.[3]
6-42-66-4
Huesler M.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-43-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-47-5
R16
Zhang Z.
Mejia N.
7-56-746-3
Olivo R.[8]
Oliveira G.
5-76-36-2
Huesler M.[6]
Shang J.
6-47-66
Bellier A.
Gaio F.[7]
6-31-66-3
Martin A.[1]
Kuhn N.
2-66-46-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Istomin D.
6-44-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-766-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Clarke J.[5]
6-46-0
R32
Clarke J.[5]
Zukas M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-2
Gaio F.[7]
Krstin P.
6-22-67-5
Jarry N.[2]
Melzer G.
2-66-37-64
Istomin D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-736-16-3
Oliveira G.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-5
Huesler M.[6]
Quiroz R.
7-616-3
Shang J.
Habib H.
4-67-616-2
Zhang Z.
Mena F.[4]
7-636-1
Martin A.[1]
Lenz J.
6-16-1
Soares Klier Junior G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-676-4
Mejia N.
Durasovic V.
7-56-737-63
Bellier A.
Jianu F.
6-33-67-5
Kuhn N.
Ficovich J.
7-625-76-3
Olivo R.[8]
Cazaux A.
6-43-66-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Donskoy E.
7-626-3