Antoine Bellier vs Renzo Olivo — San Luis Potosi CH Final

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Final
SUI
Antoine Bellier
29 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
Renzo Olivo
ARG8
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Bellier A.
6-7 6-4 7-5
Olivo R.
Bellier A.
62672
Olivo R.
77451

Antoine Bellier defeated Renzo Olivo 6-7 6-4 7-5 in the San Luis Potosi CH final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bellier A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Olivo R.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bellier A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bellier A.Olivo R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
78%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
31%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.8
1.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (141 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bellier A.Olivo R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
8
Break points saved·Dominant
89
33
Break points won·Clear edge
0
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
27
Tiebreaks·Even
39
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bellier A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Olivo R.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
6.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.1
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bellier A.
Olivo R.[8]
6-726-47-5
Semi-finals
Olivo R.[8]
Jarry N.[2]
6-36-2
Bellier A.
Huesler M.[6]
2-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bellier A.
Martin A.[1]
6-36-4
Olivo R.[8]
Escobedo E.[3]
6-42-66-4
Huesler M.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-43-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-47-5
R16
Zhang Z.
Mejia N.
7-56-746-3
Olivo R.[8]
Oliveira G.
5-76-36-2
Huesler M.[6]
Shang J.
6-47-66
Bellier A.
Gaio F.[7]
6-31-66-3
Martin A.[1]
Kuhn N.
2-66-46-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Istomin D.
6-44-66-3
Jarry N.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-766-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Clarke J.[5]
6-46-0
R32
Clarke J.[5]
Zukas M.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-2
Gaio F.[7]
Krstin P.
6-22-67-5
Jarry N.[2]
Melzer G.
2-66-37-64
Istomin D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-736-16-3
Oliveira G.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-5
Huesler M.[6]
Quiroz R.
7-616-3
Shang J.
Habib H.
4-67-616-2
Zhang Z.
Mena F.[4]
7-636-1
Martin A.[1]
Lenz J.
6-16-1
Soares Klier Junior G.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-676-4
Mejia N.
Durasovic V.
7-56-737-63
Bellier A.
Jianu F.
6-33-67-5
Kuhn N.
Ficovich J.
7-625-76-3
Olivo R.[8]
Cazaux A.
6-43-66-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Donskoy E.
7-626-3