Nerman Fatic vs Gregoire Barrere — Barletta CH Round of 32

Barletta CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
FRA
Gregoire Barrere
#1288ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Fatic N.
6-3 6-3
Barrere G.
Fatic N.
662
Barrere G.
330

Nerman Fatic defeated Gregoire Barrere 6-3 6-3 in the Barletta CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Barrere G.

Barrere G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Barrere G.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Barrere G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
50
Break points saved·Dominant
63
92
Break points won·Clear edge
36
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
84
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Barrere G.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
9.3
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[2]
Zekic M.
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Borges N.[2]
Kolar Z.[3]
7-676-3
Zekic M.
Nardi L.
6-747-57-62
Quarter-finals
Borges N.[2]
Darderi L.
1-67-646-1
Zekic M.
Shevchenko A.
6-46-4
Kolar Z.[3]
Sels J.
5-77-56-1
Nardi L.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-4
R16
Shevchenko A.
Bonadio R.
3-67-663-0
Nardi L.
Copil M.
W/O
Darderi L.
Couacaud E.[6]
4-67-616-2
Kolar Z.[3]
Pellegrino A.
6-36-2
Sels J.
Fatic N.
5-76-17-5
Zekic M.
Passaro F.
2-67-6106-0
Blancaneaux G.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-4
Borges N.[2]
Ovcharenko O.
7-636-4
R32
Bonadio R.
Rodionov J.[4]
6-06-2
Borges N.[2]
Droguet T.
6-16-4
Ovcharenko O.
Rosol L.
7-52-66-3
Couacaud E.[6]
Giustino L.
6-46-4
Kolar Z.[3]
Forti F.
6-26-0
Sels J.
Lestienne C.[7]
5-76-46-0
Passaro F.
Agamenone F.[5]
6-46-3
Zekic M.
Arnaboldi A.
2-66-46-0
Arnaldi M.
Zeppieri G.
0-67-647-64
Nardi L.
Muller A.
6-16-4
Pellegrino A.
Gerch L.
2-66-36-3
Darderi L.
Karlovskiy E.
6-736-36-3
Shevchenko A.
Svrcina D.
2-66-06-2
Fatic N.
Barrere G.
6-36-3
Blancaneaux G.
Zuk K.[8]
6-46-746-3
Copil M.
Simon G.[1]
6-24-66-4