Sebastian Baez vs Marco Cecchinato — Monte Carlo Masters Qualifying Round 1

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Sebastian Baez
ARG4
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
Marco Cecchinato
ITA
Marco Cecchinato
#175ATP
1576ELO
1546Clay ELO
$149kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
Baez S.
6-7 6-1 7-6
Cecchinato M.
Baez S.
646782
Cecchinato M.
771661

Sebastian Baez defeated Marco Cecchinato 6-7 6-1 7-6 in the Monte Carlo Masters qualifying round 1 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #56.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cecchinato M.

Cecchinato M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baez S.Cecchinato M.
1
Serve
—
44
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Cecchinato M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
72%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Cecchinato M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
89
Break points won·Dominant
86
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
36
Tiebreaks·Even
83
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baez S.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Cecchinato M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+171 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Clay Elo 1546
7.4Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1576
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
3.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 8
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.7
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Cecchinato M.
Freshness·Dominant
100
69

Baez S.: 15 days rest · Cecchinato M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 40%
Q2
Ruusuvuori E.[11]
Cobolli F.
4-66-46-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Sousa J.[13]
6-47-68
Munar J.[10]
Otte O.[7]
6-06-786-2
Rune H.[14]
Cressy M.[6]
6-37-5
Baez S.[4]
Majchrzak K.[9]
6-14-66-1
Dellien H.
Daniel T.
6-46-796-3
Lehecka J.
Bonzi B.[1]
6-46-3
Q1
Otte O.[7]
Vacherot V.
6-47-63
Zapata Miralles B.
Kwon S.[3]
6-756-46-2
Munar J.[10]
Nys H.
6-26-2
Rune H.[14]
Albot R.
6-26-3
Lehecka J.
Laaksonen H.[12]
6-706-46-2
Cobolli F.
Gaston H.[2]
6-46-2
Cressy M.[6]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Sousa J.[13]
Taberner C.
6-16-1
Dellien H.
Mannarino A.[5]
6-14-67-5
Baez S.[4]
Cecchinato M.
6-746-17-66
Ruusuvuori E.[11]
Mager G.
6-37-5
Daniel T.
Millman J.[8]
6-26-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.[9]
Ymer M.
6-24-66-4