Alexey Vatutin vs Miljan Zekic — Sanremo CH Round of 16

Sanremo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
RUS
Alexey Vatutin
#610ATP
1415ELO
1374Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
SRB
Miljan Zekic
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Vatutin A.
5-7 6-2 6-4
Zekic M.
Vatutin A.
5662
Zekic M.
7241

Alexey Vatutin defeated Miljan Zekic 5-7 6-2 6-4 in the Sanremo CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vatutin A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Zekic M.

Zekic M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Vatutin A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vatutin A.Zekic M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
55%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.3
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (183 vs 89). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vatutin A.Zekic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
0
22
Break points saved·Clear edge
18
36
Break points won·Clear edge
32
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
10
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vatutin A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zekic M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[1]
Passaro F.
6-12-66-4
Semi-finals
Passaro F.
Mager G.[2]
6-16-1
Rune H.[1]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Mager G.[2]
Fabbiano T.[7]
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Vatutin A.
6-23-67-67
Rune H.[1]
Gigante M.
6-36-0
Passaro F.
Valkusz M.
4-66-36-2
R16
Gigante M.
Martineau M.
6-37-5
Mager G.[2]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-53-67-5
Valkusz M.
Albot R.[3]
6-31-66-2
Passaro F.
Muller A.[8]
6-16-2
Vatutin A.
Zekic M.
5-76-26-4
Rune H.[1]
Fatic N.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-3
R32
Zekic M.
Herbert P.[4]
4-66-36-3
Mager G.[2]
Forti F.
6-26-4
Karlovskiy E.
Vacherot V.
6-16-757-62
Albot R.[3]
Sultanov K.
6-23-66-1
Passaro F.
Gojo B.
6-46-2
Muller A.[8]
Miedler L.
6-36-4
Arnaboldi A.
Grenier H.[5]
6-36-2
Gigante M.
Cobolli F.[6]
2-66-46-3
Fatic N.
Zeppieri G.
6-46-2
Rune H.[1]
Tiurnev E.
6-37-612
Valkusz M.
Donati M.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Arnaldi M.
7-57-5
Vatutin A.
Haase R.
7-52-66-2
Sachko V.
Lavagno E.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sels J.
7-51-66-2
Martineau M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-34-0