Lukas Rosol vs Kacper Zuk — Oeiras 2 CH Round of 16

Oeiras 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
hard
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
Rosol L.
6-4 6-3
Zuk K.
Rosol L.
662
Zuk K.
430

Lukas Rosol defeated Kacper Zuk 6-4 6-3 in the Oeiras 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kacper Zuk came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lukas Rosol claimed a first win over Kacper Zuk in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-28WimbledonQ1grassKacper Zuk6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Zuk K.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Zuk K.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Zuk K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
76
Break points won·Slight edge
3
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosol L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zuk K.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.1
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
5.1
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Elias G.
Giannessi A.[5]
7-646-1
Semi-finals
Elias G.
Kolar Z.[2]
2-66-26-1
Giannessi A.[5]
Kovalik J.[7]
2-66-47-5
Quarter-finals
Kolar Z.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[8]
6-10-67-66
Elias G.
Piros Z.
6-45-76-3
Kovalik J.[7]
Rosol L.
7-666-2
Giannessi A.[5]
Oconnell C.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Gerch L.
6-26-1
Elias G.
Borges N.[3]
2-67-56-3
Giannessi A.[5]
Marozsan F.
5-77-646-4
Oconnell C.[4]
Lamasine T.
6-36-4
Kovalik J.[7]
Furness E.
7-656-2
Rosol L.
Zuk K.
6-46-3
Kolar Z.[2]
Gutierrez O.
6-46-3
Piros Z.
Popko D.[6]
7-56-4
R32
Elias G.
Fanselow S.
6-16-2
Rosol L.
Skatov T.
7-657-65
Gerch L.
Jianu F.
6-36-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Lazarov A.
7-650-66-2
Piros Z.
Domingues J.
6-36-3
Lamasine T.
Rybakov A.
6-32-67-65
Kovalik J.[7]
Kirkin E.
6-26-3
Furness E.
Araujo P.
7-676-3
Zuk K.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-47-5
Popko D.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-43-66-4
Marozsan F.
Yevseyev D.
6-26-3
Gutierrez O.
Cacao T.
6-26-3
Kolar Z.[2]
Wessels L.
6-16-4
Giannessi A.[5]
Darderi L.
4-67-656-1
Oconnell C.[4]
Serdarusic N.
4-66-36-2
Borges N.[3]
Sousa P.
4-67-56-3