Dennis Novak vs Filip Misolic — Murcia CH Round of 32

Murcia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUT3
Dennis Novak
#818ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Novak D.
6-3 7-5
Misolic F.
Novak D.
672
Misolic F.
350

Dennis Novak defeated Filip Misolic 6-3 7-5 in the Murcia CH round of 32 on clay. Dennis Novak extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Dennis Novak closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-03WimbledonQ1grassDennis Novak6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Novak D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Novak D.

Serve advantage — Novak D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Novak D.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Novak D.Misolic F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
79
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
91
Break points won·Dominant
15
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Novak D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Misolic F.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.[4]
Gombos N.[1]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Gombos N.[1]
Novak D.[3]
1-66-17-62
Tseng C.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.[4]
Cachin P.
7-656-3
Novak D.[3]
Gimeno Valero C.
3-67-646-3
Gombos N.[1]
Trungelliti M.[7]
6-06-4
Gakhov I.
Forejtek J.
7-654-67-5
R16
Gakhov I.
Giustino L.
6-46-3
Forejtek J.
Klein L.
6-37-5
Cachin P.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-3
Gimeno Valero C.
Heyman C.
6-36-3
Novak D.[3]
Damas M.
6-06-2
Trungelliti M.[7]
Geerts M.
6-33-66-3
Gombos N.[1]
Roca Batalla O.
5-76-37-62
Tseng C.[4]
Merida Aguilar D.
6-26-3
R32
Trungelliti M.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-35-2
Giustino L.
Nikles J.
7-654-66-4
Forejtek J.
Molleker R.
7-56-3
Klein L.
Pellegrino A.[8]
6-31-66-3
Merida Aguilar D.
Alvarez Varona N.
2-66-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Ofner S.
6-36-3
Cachin P.
Marterer M.[6]
6-06-746-3
Heyman C.
Shevchenko A.
6-47-62
Damas M.
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-43-67-66
Roca Batalla O.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-4
Novak D.[3]
Misolic F.
6-37-5
Tseng C.[4]
Krutykh O.
6-36-3
Gombos N.[1]
Nava E.
6-46-4
Gimeno Valero C.
Kuhn N.
3-66-26-1
Gakhov I.
Cerundolo J.[2]
3-67-632-0