Evgeny Karlovskiy vs Valentin Vacherot — Sanremo CH Round of 32

Sanremo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
RUS
Evgeny Karlovskiy
#1219ATP
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Valentin Vacherot
MON
Valentin Vacherot
#21ATP
1903ELO
1789Clay ELO
$1.0MYTD
$3.5MCAREER
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWWLWW
Karlovskiy E.
6-1 6-7 7-6
Vacherot V.
Karlovskiy E.
665772
Vacherot V.
177621

Evgeny Karlovskiy defeated Valentin Vacherot 6-1 6-7 7-6 in the Sanremo CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Valentin Vacherot came in ranked #21.

Key context

  • Match story: Evgeny Karlovskiy came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Karlovskiy E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Vacherot V.

Vacherot V.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Karlovskiy E.

Serve advantage — Vacherot V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Karlovskiy E.Vacherot V.
—
Serve
38
—
Return
55

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Karlovskiy E.Vacherot V.
1st serve in·Even
67%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Karlovskiy E.Vacherot V.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
69
Break points saved·Dominant
55
96
Break points won·Dominant
5
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
7
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
12
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Karlovskiy E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vacherot V.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 119 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.1
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[1]
Passaro F.
6-12-66-4
Semi-finals
Passaro F.
Mager G.[2]
6-16-1
Rune H.[1]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Mager G.[2]
Fabbiano T.[7]
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Vatutin A.
6-23-67-67
Rune H.[1]
Gigante M.
6-36-0
Passaro F.
Valkusz M.
4-66-36-2
R16
Gigante M.
Martineau M.
6-37-5
Mager G.[2]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-53-67-5
Valkusz M.
Albot R.[3]
6-31-66-2
Passaro F.
Muller A.[8]
6-16-2
Vatutin A.
Zekic M.
5-76-26-4
Rune H.[1]
Fatic N.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-3
R32
Zekic M.
Herbert P.[4]
4-66-36-3
Mager G.[2]
Forti F.
6-26-4
Karlovskiy E.
Vacherot V.
6-16-757-62
Albot R.[3]
Sultanov K.
6-23-66-1
Passaro F.
Gojo B.
6-46-2
Muller A.[8]
Miedler L.
6-36-4
Arnaboldi A.
Grenier H.[5]
6-36-2
Gigante M.
Cobolli F.[6]
2-66-46-3
Fatic N.
Zeppieri G.
6-46-2
Rune H.[1]
Tiurnev E.
6-37-612
Valkusz M.
Donati M.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Arnaldi M.
7-57-5
Vatutin A.
Haase R.
7-52-66-2
Sachko V.
Lavagno E.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sels J.
7-51-66-2
Martineau M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-34-0