Norbert Gombos vs Emilio Nava — Murcia CH Round of 32

Murcia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Norbert Gombos
SVK1
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1455Clay ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Gombos N.
6-4 6-4
Nava E.
Gombos N.
662
Nava E.
440

Norbert Gombos defeated Emilio Nava 6-4 6-4 in the Murcia CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Norbert Gombos edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gombos N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Gombos N.Nava E.
—
Serve
23
—
Return
3

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gombos N.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gombos N.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
94
Break points won·Slight edge
8
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
36
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gombos N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Nava E.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.6Clay Elo 1455
Surface ELO
7.4+231 Clay Elo edge
2.3Overall Elo 1472
ELO gap
7.7Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
6.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
9.4
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gombos N.Nava E.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
100

Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d) · Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.[4]
Gombos N.[1]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Gombos N.[1]
Novak D.[3]
1-66-17-62
Tseng C.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.[4]
Cachin P.
7-656-3
Novak D.[3]
Gimeno Valero C.
3-67-646-3
Gombos N.[1]
Trungelliti M.[7]
6-06-4
Gakhov I.
Forejtek J.
7-654-67-5
R16
Gakhov I.
Giustino L.
6-46-3
Forejtek J.
Klein L.
6-37-5
Cachin P.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-3
Gimeno Valero C.
Heyman C.
6-36-3
Novak D.[3]
Damas M.
6-06-2
Trungelliti M.[7]
Geerts M.
6-33-66-3
Gombos N.[1]
Roca Batalla O.
5-76-37-62
Tseng C.[4]
Merida Aguilar D.
6-26-3
R32
Trungelliti M.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-35-2
Giustino L.
Nikles J.
7-654-66-4
Forejtek J.
Molleker R.
7-56-3
Klein L.
Pellegrino A.[8]
6-31-66-3
Merida Aguilar D.
Alvarez Varona N.
2-66-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Ofner S.
6-36-3
Cachin P.
Marterer M.[6]
6-06-746-3
Heyman C.
Shevchenko A.
6-47-62
Damas M.
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-43-67-66
Roca Batalla O.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-4
Novak D.[3]
Misolic F.
6-37-5
Tseng C.[4]
Krutykh O.
6-36-3
Gombos N.[1]
Nava E.
6-46-4
Gimeno Valero C.
Kuhn N.
3-66-26-1
Gakhov I.
Cerundolo J.[2]
3-67-632-0