Holger Rune vs Matteo Gigante — Sanremo CH Quarter-final

Sanremo CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Holger Rune
DEN1
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1729Clay ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1598Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Rune H.
6-3 6-0
Gigante M.
Rune H.
662
Gigante M.
300

Holger Rune defeated Matteo Gigante 6-3 6-0 in the Sanremo CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Holger Rune came in ranked #81.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Gigante M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Gigante M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Gigante M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
78
Break points won·Dominant
84
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
98
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gigante M.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.9+131 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1598
7.4Overall Elo 1757
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1592
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
2.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[1]
Passaro F.
6-12-66-4
Semi-finals
Passaro F.
Mager G.[2]
6-16-1
Rune H.[1]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Mager G.[2]
Fabbiano T.[7]
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Vatutin A.
6-23-67-67
Rune H.[1]
Gigante M.
6-36-0
Passaro F.
Valkusz M.
4-66-36-2
R16
Gigante M.
Martineau M.
6-37-5
Mager G.[2]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-53-67-5
Valkusz M.
Albot R.[3]
6-31-66-2
Passaro F.
Muller A.[8]
6-16-2
Vatutin A.
Zekic M.
5-76-26-4
Rune H.[1]
Fatic N.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-3
R32
Zekic M.
Herbert P.[4]
4-66-36-3
Mager G.[2]
Forti F.
6-26-4
Karlovskiy E.
Vacherot V.
6-16-757-62
Albot R.[3]
Sultanov K.
6-23-66-1
Passaro F.
Gojo B.
6-46-2
Muller A.[8]
Miedler L.
6-36-4
Arnaboldi A.
Grenier H.[5]
6-36-2
Gigante M.
Cobolli F.[6]
2-66-46-3
Fatic N.
Zeppieri G.
6-46-2
Rune H.[1]
Tiurnev E.
6-37-612
Valkusz M.
Donati M.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Arnaldi M.
7-57-5
Vatutin A.
Haase R.
7-52-66-2
Sachko V.
Lavagno E.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sels J.
7-51-66-2
Martineau M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-34-0