Chun Hsin Tseng vs Ivan Gakhov — Murcia CH Semi-final

Murcia CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE4
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Tseng C.
6-4 6-4
Gakhov I.
Tseng C.
662
Gakhov I.
440

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Ivan Gakhov 6-4 6-4 in the Murcia CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Chun Hsin Tseng edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
34
Break points saved·Even
83
82
Break points won·Slight edge
15
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
59
Tiebreaks·Even
23
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Gakhov I.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.7+157 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Clay Elo 1384
6.2Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1430
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.[4]
Gombos N.[1]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Gombos N.[1]
Novak D.[3]
1-66-17-62
Tseng C.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.[4]
Cachin P.
7-656-3
Novak D.[3]
Gimeno Valero C.
3-67-646-3
Gombos N.[1]
Trungelliti M.[7]
6-06-4
Gakhov I.
Forejtek J.
7-654-67-5
R16
Gakhov I.
Giustino L.
6-46-3
Forejtek J.
Klein L.
6-37-5
Cachin P.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-3
Gimeno Valero C.
Heyman C.
6-36-3
Novak D.[3]
Damas M.
6-06-2
Trungelliti M.[7]
Geerts M.
6-33-66-3
Gombos N.[1]
Roca Batalla O.
5-76-37-62
Tseng C.[4]
Merida Aguilar D.
6-26-3
R32
Trungelliti M.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-35-2
Giustino L.
Nikles J.
7-654-66-4
Forejtek J.
Molleker R.
7-56-3
Klein L.
Pellegrino A.[8]
6-31-66-3
Merida Aguilar D.
Alvarez Varona N.
2-66-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Ofner S.
6-36-3
Cachin P.
Marterer M.[6]
6-06-746-3
Heyman C.
Shevchenko A.
6-47-62
Damas M.
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-43-67-66
Roca Batalla O.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-4
Novak D.[3]
Misolic F.
6-37-5
Tseng C.[4]
Krutykh O.
6-36-3
Gombos N.[1]
Nava E.
6-46-4
Gimeno Valero C.
Kuhn N.
3-66-26-1
Gakhov I.
Cerundolo J.[2]
3-67-632-0