Gianluca Mager vs Thomas Fabbiano — Sanremo CH Quarter-final

Sanremo CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ITA2
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
ITA7
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Mager G.
6-4 6-3
Fabbiano T.
Mager G.
662
Fabbiano T.
430

Gianluca Mager defeated Thomas Fabbiano 6-4 6-3 in the Sanremo CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mager G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Serve advantage — Fabbiano T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mager G.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mager G.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
81
Break points won·Clear edge
4
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
28
Tiebreaks·Even
40
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mager G.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Fabbiano T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
8.6
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[1]
Passaro F.
6-12-66-4
Semi-finals
Passaro F.
Mager G.[2]
6-16-1
Rune H.[1]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Mager G.[2]
Fabbiano T.[7]
6-46-3
Arnaboldi A.
Vatutin A.
6-23-67-67
Rune H.[1]
Gigante M.
6-36-0
Passaro F.
Valkusz M.
4-66-36-2
R16
Gigante M.
Martineau M.
6-37-5
Mager G.[2]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-53-67-5
Valkusz M.
Albot R.[3]
6-31-66-2
Passaro F.
Muller A.[8]
6-16-2
Vatutin A.
Zekic M.
5-76-26-4
Rune H.[1]
Fatic N.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi A.
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-3
R32
Zekic M.
Herbert P.[4]
4-66-36-3
Mager G.[2]
Forti F.
6-26-4
Karlovskiy E.
Vacherot V.
6-16-757-62
Albot R.[3]
Sultanov K.
6-23-66-1
Passaro F.
Gojo B.
6-46-2
Muller A.[8]
Miedler L.
6-36-4
Arnaboldi A.
Grenier H.[5]
6-36-2
Gigante M.
Cobolli F.[6]
2-66-46-3
Fatic N.
Zeppieri G.
6-46-2
Rune H.[1]
Tiurnev E.
6-37-612
Valkusz M.
Donati M.
6-16-2
Bonadio R.
Arnaldi M.
7-57-5
Vatutin A.
Haase R.
7-52-66-2
Sachko V.
Lavagno E.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sels J.
7-51-66-2
Martineau M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-34-0