Ulrikke Eikeri vs Nadiya Kichenok — Charleston Round of 64

Charleston · WTA · Round of 64
NOR
Ulrikke Eikeri
33 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
UKR
Nadiya Kichenok
33 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWWWLL
Eikeri U.
5-7 6-2 6-2
Kichenok N.
Eikeri U.
5662
Kichenok N.
7221

Ulrikke Eikeri defeated Nadiya Kichenok 5-7 6-2 6-2 in the Charleston round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Eikeri U.serving58% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Kichenok N.

Kichenok N.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Eikeri U.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Eikeri U.Kichenok N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
41%
47%
Service points won·Even
52%
55%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
50%
48%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
4.6
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (40 vs 8). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Eikeri U.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 91 days (−1.5)
Kichenok N.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 1099 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
0.0
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°CPartly cloudy
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 53%

Draw

Final
Bencic B.[10]
Jabeur O.[4]
6-15-76-4
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[4]
Anisimova A.[15]
2-66-16-4
Bencic B.[10]
Alexandrova E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Anisimova A.[15]
Vandeweghe C.
6-16-2
Jabeur O.[4]
Kalinina A.
6-36-2
Alexandrova E.
Linette M.
6-06-2
Bencic B.[10]
Badosa P.[2]
2-67-626-4
R16
Anisimova A.[15]
Sabalenka A.[1]
3-66-46-3
Jabeur O.[4]
Begu I.
6-36-2
Linette M.
Kanepi K.
6-34-66-2
Alexandrova E.
Pliskova K.[3]
6-36-1
Vandeweghe C.
Pegula J.[6]
6-43-66-4
Bencic B.[10]
Keys M.[9]
6-46-4
Kalinina A.
Cornet A.[12]
7-657-5
Badosa P.[2]
Liu C.
3-67-686-1
R32
Pliskova K.[3]
Zavatska K.
5-77-56-4
Liu C.
Zhang S.[16]
7-52-66-4
Sabalenka A.[1]
Riske Amritraj A.
7-636-4
Anisimova A.[15]
Putintseva Y.
6-16-2
Vandeweghe C.
Davis L.
3-66-36-3
Pegula J.[6]
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Jabeur O.[4]
Navarro E.
6-36-2
Begu I.
Tomljanovic A.[14]
6-26-3
Cornet A.[12]
Baptiste H.
6-36-2
Kalinina A.
Rybakina E.[5]
6-42-66-4
Linette M.
Fernandez L.[7]
3-66-36-4
Bencic B.[10]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-17-66
Badosa P.[2]
Bondar A.
6-16-4
Alexandrova E.
Zheng Q.
2-67-55-2
Kanepi K.
Frech M.
7-56-3
Keys M.[9]
Eikeri U.
6-36-1
R64
Riske Amritraj A.
Mcnally C.
7-56-3
Putintseva Y.
Anderson R.
6-27-69
Paolini J.
Lee G.
6-26-3
Cornet A.[12]
Parks A.
6-07-5
Navarro E.
Brengle M.
6-746-23-0
Kalinina A.
Sasnovich A.
6-46-4
Zheng Q.
Stephens S.[13]
6-34-66-0
Alexandrova E.
Kiick A.
6-16-1
Fruhvirtova L.
Konjuh A.
4-66-16-3
Frech M.
Kvitova P.[11]
7-663-2
Zhang S.[16]
Di Lorenzo F.
6-26-4
Vandeweghe C.
Gasanova A.
6-34-66-3
Anisimova A.[15]
Vickery S.
6-07-5
Linette M.
Volynets K.
4-66-37-64
Tomljanovic A.[14]
Chang S.
7-56-4
Bencic B.[10]
Wang X.
4-67-656-3
Zavatska K.
Yuan Y.
6-46-2
Begu I.
Wang X.
7-626-4
Kanepi K.
Rogers S.
6-727-56-2
Liu C.
Watson H.
6-46-2
Davis L.
Bolkvadze M.
6-26-3
Bondar A.
Hartono A.
6-16-4
Eikeri U.
Kichenok N.
5-76-26-2
Baptiste H.
Ruse E.
6-36-0