Jay Clarke vs Bernard Tomic — Mexico City CH Round of 32

Mexico City CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR8
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1414Clay ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1420Clay ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Clarke J.
6-4 6-7 6-3
Tomic B.
Clarke J.
66362
Tomic B.
47731

Jay Clarke defeated Bernard Tomic 6-4 6-7 6-3 in the Mexico City CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Bernard Tomic came in ranked #206, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jay Clarke claimed a first win over Bernard Tomic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Jay Clarke closed it out in three sets, 6–4 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-05-28Roland GarrosQ2clayBernard Tomic6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Clarke J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Clarke J.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clarke J.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
53
Break points saved·Dominant
63
92
Break points won·Clear edge
21
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
10
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Clarke J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.5Clay Elo 1414
Surface ELO
5.5+6 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1458
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1475
5.0
H2H
5.0
1.5
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Clarke J.Tomic B.
Freshness·
—
84

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Huesler M.
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Huesler M.
Meligeni Alves F.
7-656-2
Etcheverry T.[2]
Jarry N.[7]
3-67-57-64
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[2]
Alves M.
6-16-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Olivo R.
7-656-3
Huesler M.
Janvier M.
6-36-3
Jarry N.[7]
Melzer G.
7-647-5
R16
Alves M.
Clarke J.[8]
7-56-3
Jarry N.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
7-656-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Krstin P.
6-16-4
Olivo R.
De Jong J.
6-02-66-3
Janvier M.
Londero J.[5]
3-66-37-65
Huesler M.
Ficovich J.
6-46-1
Melzer G.
Barrientos N.
6-16-1
Etcheverry T.[2]
Ejupovic E.
6-17-62
R32
Etcheverry T.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-36-2
Ejupovic E.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-4
Clarke J.[8]
Tomic B.
6-46-736-3
Barrientos N.
Mena F.
6-12-66-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Escobedo E.[6]
1-67-656-2
Olivo R.
Chappell N.
6-44-67-62
De Jong J.
Martin A.[4]
6-26-1
Londero J.[5]
Oliveira G.
7-56-766-3
Ficovich J.
Bagnis F.[1]
6-36-2
Alves M.
Gaio F.
6-33-66-4
Huesler M.
Soares Klier Junior G.
3-66-36-4
Krstin P.
Smith K.
4-66-36-4
Jarry N.[7]
Durasovic V.
4-67-656-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Istomin D.
5-77-657-66
Melzer G.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-40-0