Renzo Olivo vs Nick Chappell — Mexico City CH Round of 32

Mexico City CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Renzo Olivo
ARG
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Olivo R.
6-4 4-6 7-6
Chappell N.
Olivo R.
64772
Chappell N.
46621

Renzo Olivo defeated Nick Chappell 6-4 4-6 7-6 in the Mexico City CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Olivo R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Olivo R.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Olivo R.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
8
0
Break points saved·Even
33
29
Break points won·Slight edge
15
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
27
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
41
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Olivo R.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
1.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.1
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Huesler M.
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Huesler M.
Meligeni Alves F.
7-656-2
Etcheverry T.[2]
Jarry N.[7]
3-67-57-64
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[2]
Alves M.
6-16-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Olivo R.
7-656-3
Huesler M.
Janvier M.
6-36-3
Jarry N.[7]
Melzer G.
7-647-5
R16
Alves M.
Clarke J.[8]
7-56-3
Jarry N.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
7-656-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Krstin P.
6-16-4
Olivo R.
De Jong J.
6-02-66-3
Janvier M.
Londero J.[5]
3-66-37-65
Huesler M.
Ficovich J.
6-46-1
Melzer G.
Barrientos N.
6-16-1
Etcheverry T.[2]
Ejupovic E.
6-17-62
R32
Etcheverry T.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-36-2
Ejupovic E.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-4
Clarke J.[8]
Tomic B.
6-46-736-3
Barrientos N.
Mena F.
6-12-66-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Escobedo E.[6]
1-67-656-2
Olivo R.
Chappell N.
6-44-67-62
De Jong J.
Martin A.[4]
6-26-1
Londero J.[5]
Oliveira G.
7-56-766-3
Ficovich J.
Bagnis F.[1]
6-36-2
Alves M.
Gaio F.
6-33-66-4
Huesler M.
Soares Klier Junior G.
3-66-36-4
Krstin P.
Smith K.
4-66-36-4
Jarry N.[7]
Durasovic V.
4-67-656-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Istomin D.
5-77-657-66
Melzer G.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-40-0