Ivan Gakhov vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo — Murcia CH Round of 32

Murcia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
ARG2
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
#45ATP
1790ELO
1762Clay ELO
$752kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLWWWW
Gakhov I.
3-6 7-6 2-0
Cerundolo J.
Gakhov I.
3772–
Cerundolo J.
6630–

Ivan Gakhov advanced when Juan Manuel Cerundolo retired 3-6 7-6 2-0 in the Murcia CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cerundolo J.

Cerundolo J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Cerundolo J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Gakhov I.Cerundolo J.
—
Serve
15
—
Return
41

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Cerundolo J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Cerundolo J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
85
Break points saved·Even
82
82
Break points won·Dominant
9
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Cerundolo J.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.3Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
8.7+377 Clay Elo edge
1.7Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
8.3Overall Elo 1790
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gakhov I.Cerundolo J.
Freshness·
—
100

Cerundolo J.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.[4]
Gombos N.[1]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Gombos N.[1]
Novak D.[3]
1-66-17-62
Tseng C.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.[4]
Cachin P.
7-656-3
Novak D.[3]
Gimeno Valero C.
3-67-646-3
Gombos N.[1]
Trungelliti M.[7]
6-06-4
Gakhov I.
Forejtek J.
7-654-67-5
R16
Gakhov I.
Giustino L.
6-46-3
Forejtek J.
Klein L.
6-37-5
Cachin P.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-3
Gimeno Valero C.
Heyman C.
6-36-3
Novak D.[3]
Damas M.
6-06-2
Trungelliti M.[7]
Geerts M.
6-33-66-3
Gombos N.[1]
Roca Batalla O.
5-76-37-62
Tseng C.[4]
Merida Aguilar D.
6-26-3
R32
Trungelliti M.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-35-2
Giustino L.
Nikles J.
7-654-66-4
Forejtek J.
Molleker R.
7-56-3
Klein L.
Pellegrino A.[8]
6-31-66-3
Merida Aguilar D.
Alvarez Varona N.
2-66-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Ofner S.
6-36-3
Cachin P.
Marterer M.[6]
6-06-746-3
Heyman C.
Shevchenko A.
6-47-62
Damas M.
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-43-67-66
Roca Batalla O.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-4
Novak D.[3]
Misolic F.
6-37-5
Tseng C.[4]
Krutykh O.
6-36-3
Gombos N.[1]
Nava E.
6-46-4
Gimeno Valero C.
Kuhn N.
3-66-26-1
Gakhov I.
Cerundolo J.[2]
3-67-632-0